The role of edaphic, vegetational and spatial factors in structuring soil animal communities in a floodplain forest of the Dnipro river

Authors

  • Oleksandr V. Zhukov Department of Zoology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University Author
  • Olga M. Kunah Department of Zoology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University Author
  • Yuliya Y. Dubinina Department of Zoology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University Author
  • Viktoriya O. Novikova Department of Zoology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2018-0002

Keywords:

ecological groups, ecological niche, environmental factors, neutral diversity, spatial variation

Abstract

This paper examines the role of ecological factors, derived from principal component analysis performed on edaphic and vegetational dataset as well as spatial variables, in structuring the soil macrofauna community of the Dnipro floodplain within the ‘Dnipro-Orilsky’ Nature Reserve (Ukraine). The soil macrofauna was defined as invertebrates visible to the naked eye (macroscopic organisms). The test points formed a regular grid with a mesh size of 3 m with 7 × 15 dimensions. Thus, the total test point number was 105. At each point, soil-zoological samples of 0.25 × 0.25 m were taken for quantifying the soil macrofauna. The spatial structure was modeled by a set of independent spatial patterns obtained by means of principal coordinates of neighbor matrices analysis (PCNM-variables). Spatial PCNM-variables explain significantly more variations of the community (19.9%) than edaphic factors (4.1%) and vegetation factors (3.2%). Spatial and combined environmental and spatial effects were divided into three components: broad-scale component was characterized by periodicity of spatial variation with a wavelength of 24.0–44.5 m, medium-scale – 11.1–20 m, fine-scale – 6.6–11.0 m. For a broad-scale component, environmental factors of a vegetational nature are more important, for medium-scale, edaphic factors are more important, for fine-scale, both vegetation and edaphic are important. For litter-dwelling animals, the most characteristic spatial patterns are on the broad and medium-scale levels. For endogeic and anecic animals, the most significant variability is on the fine-scale level.

References

Adler, P.B., Hillerislambers, J., Levine J.M., 2007. A niche for neutrality. Ecology Letters, 10: 95–104.17257097 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00996.x

Amarasekare, P., 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecology Letters, 6: 1109–1122. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00530.x

Anderson, J.M., 1975. The enigma of soil animal species diversity. In Vanek, J. (eds). Progress in soil zoology. Prague: Czech, Academy of Sciences, p. 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1933-0_5

Anderson, M.J., 2011. Navigating the multiple meanings of β-diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology Letters, 14: 19–28.21070562 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x

Baldeck, C.A., Harms, K.E., Yavitt, J.B., John, R., Turner, B.L., Valencia, R., Navarrete, H., Davies, S.J., Chuyong, G.B., Kenfack, D., Thomas, D.W., Madawala, S., Gunatilleke, N., Gunatilleke, S., Bunyavejchewin, S., Kiratiprayoon, S., Yaacob, A., Supardi, M.N., Dalling, J.W., 2013. Soil resources and topography shape local tree community structure in tropical forests. In Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280 (1753): 2012–2032.357434823256196 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2532

Barot, S., Gignoux, J., 2004. Mechanisms promoting plant coexistence: can all the proposed processes be reconciled? Oikos, 106: 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13038.x

Belgard, A.L., 1950. Lesnaya rastitel’nost’ yugo-vostoka USSR [Forest vegetation of the south-eastern part of Ukraine]. Kyiv: KGU im. Shevchenko Press. 263 p.

Belgard, A.L., 1971. Stepnoe lesovedenie [Steppe forestry]. Moskva: Lesnaya promyshlennosť. 336 p.

Belyea, L.R., Lancaster, J., 1999. Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos, 86 (3): 402–416. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546646

Berg, M.P., 2012. Patterns of biodiversity at fine and small spatial scales. In Wall, D.H., Bardgett, R.D., Behan-Pelletier, V., Herrick, J.E., Jones, T.H., Ritz, K., Six, J., Strong, D.R., van der Putten, W.H. (eds). Soil ecology and ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, p. 136–152.

Berg, M.P., Bengtsson, J., 2007. Temporal and spatial variability in soil food web structure. Oikos, 116: 1789–1804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15748.x

Blanchet, F.G., Bergeron, J.A.C., Spence, J.R., He, F., 2013. Landscape effects of disturbance, habitat heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation for a ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblage in mature boreal forest. Ecography, 36: 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07762.x

Blanchet, F.G., Legendre, P., Borcard, D., 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology, 89 (9): 2623–2632.18831183 https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0986.1

Borcard, D., Legendre, P., 1994. Environmental control and spatial structure in ecological communities: An example using oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatei). Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 1: 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00714196

Borcard, D., Legendre, P., Avois-Jacquet, C., Tuosimoto, H., 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology, 85: 1826–1832. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-3111

Borcard, D., Legendre, P., Drapeau, P., 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology, 73: 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940179

Brygadyrenko, V.V., 2015. Evaluation of the ecological niche of some abundant species of the subfamily Platyninae (Coleoptera, Carabidae) against the background of eight ecological factors. Folia Oecologica, 42: 75–88

Brygadyrenko, V.V., 2016. Effect of canopy density on litter invertebrate community structure in pine forests. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35 (1): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0007

Buzuk, G.N., 2017. Fitoindikaciya s primeneniem ekologicheskikh shkal i regressionnogo analiza: ekolo-gicheskiĭ indeks [Phytoindication with ecological scales and regression analysis: environmental index]. Vestnik Farmacii, 2 (76): 31–37.

Cadotte, M.W., Fukami, T., 2005. Dispersal, spatial scale and species diversity in a hierarchically structured experimental landscape. Ecology Letters, 8: 548–557.21352459 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00750.x

Caruso, T., Taormina, M., Migliorini, M., 2012. Relative role of deterministic and stochastic determinants of soil animal community: a spatially explicit analysis of oribatid mites. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81(1): 214–221.21722106 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01886.x

Chang, L., Zeleny, D., Li, C., Chiu, S., Hsieh, C., 2013. Better environmental data may reverse conclusions about niche- and dispersal-based processes in community assembly. Ecology, 94: 2145–2151.24358699 https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2053.1

Chase, J.M., 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia, 136: 489–498.12836009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1311-7

Chave, J., 2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7: 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2003.00566.x

Clark, J.S., 2012. The coherence problem with the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27: 199–203.22401902 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.02.001

Decaëns, T., Jiménez, J.J., Rossi, J.-P., 2009. A null-model analysis of the spatio-temporal distribution of earthworm species assemblages in Colombian grasslands. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25 (4): 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467409006075

Decaëns, T., Rossi, J.-P., 2001. Spatio-temporal structure of earthworm community and soil heterogeneity in a tropical pasture. Ecography, 24 (6): 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240606.x

Diduh, Y.P., 2012. Prinzypy bioindicatzii [The principles of bioindication]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. 344 p.

Didukh, Y.P., Fitsailo, T.V., Korotchenko, I.A., Yakushenko, D.M., Pashkevych, N.A., 2011. Biotopi lisovoi ta lisostepovoi zon Ukriiny [Biotopes of forest and forest-steppe zones of Ukraine]. Kyiv: LLC MACROS. 288 p.

Didukh, Y.P., 2011. The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre. 176 p.

Digel, C., Curtsdotter, A., Riede, J., Klarner, B., Brose, U., 2014. Unravelling the complex structure of forest soil food webs: higher omnivory and more trophic levels. Oikos, 123: 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.00865

Dinno, A., 2012. paran: Horn’s test of principal components/factors. R package version 1.5.1. [cit. 2017-11-03]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=paran

Dornelas, M., 2010. Disturbance and change in biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365: 3719–3727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0295

Dornelas, M., Connolly S.R., Hughes T.P., 2006. Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature, 440: 80–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04534

Drake, J.A., 1990. Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5: 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(90)90223-Z

Dray, S., Legendre, P., Peres-Neto, P., 2006. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecological Modelling, 196: 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015

Dray, S. with contributions of Legendre, P., Blanchet, G., 2016. packfor: forward selection with permutation (Canoco p. 46). R package version 0.0-8/r136. [cit. 2017-11-03]. https://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/sedar/

Dvořáková, J., Horsák, M., 2012. Variation of snail assemblages in hay meadows: disentangling predictive power of abiotic environment and vegetation. Malacologia, 55: 151–162. https://doi.org/10.4002/040.055.0110

Ellenberg, H., 1974. Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta geobotanica, 9. Göttingen: Göltze. 197 p.

Ettema, C.H., Rathbun, S.L., Coleman, D.C., 2000. On spatiotemporal patchiness and the coexistence of five species of Chronogaster (Nematoda: Chronogasteridae) in a riparian wetland. Oecologia, 125: 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000468

Ettema, C., Wardle, D.A., 2002. Spatial soil ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17: 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02496-5

Ettema, C.H., Yeates, G.W., 2003. Nested spatial biodiversity patterns of nematode genera in a New Zealand forest and pasture soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35 (2): 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00276-6

Fukami, T., 2010. Community assembly dynamics in space. In Verhoef, H.A., Morin, P.J. (eds). Community ecology: processes, models, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228973.003.0005

Gazol, A., Ibanez, R., 2010. Plant species composition in a temperate forest: multi-scale patterns and determinants. Oecologia, 36: 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2010.09.009

Gholami, S., Sayad, E., Gebbers, R., Schirrmann, M., Joschko, M., Timmer, J., 2016. Spatial analysis of riparian forest soil macrofauna and its relation to abiotic soil properties. Pedobiologia, 59 (1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2015.12.003

Gilyarov, M.S., Folkmanova, B., 1957. Gubonogie mnogonozhki (Chilopoda) stepnoĭ zony jugo-vostoka Evrope-jskoĭ chasti SSSR kak pokazateli pochvennykh usloviĭ v lesonasazhdeniyakh [Centipedes (Chilopoda) of the steppe zone in the southeast of the European part of the USSR as indicators of soil conditions in forest stands]. Izvestiya Akademii nauk SSSR, Seriya Biologicheskaya, 2: 211–219.

Horn, J.L., 1965. A rationale and a test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30: 179–185.14306381 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447

Horsák, M., Hájek, M., Tichý, L., Juřičková, L., 2007. Plant indicator values as a tool for land mollusc autecology assessment. Acta Oecologica, 32: 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2007.03.011

Hu, Y.-H., D.-Y. Sheng, Y.-Z. Xiang, Z.-J. Yang, D.-P. Xu, N.-N. Zhang, Shi, L.-L., 2013. The environment, not space, dominantly structures the landscape patterns of the richness and composition of the tropical understory vegetation. PLoS ONE, 8:e81308.383836624278417 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081308

Hubbell, S.P., 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. 392 p.

Hutchinson, G.E., 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22: 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039

Hutchinson, G.E., 1965. The niche: an abstractly inhabited hypervolume. In Hutchinson, G.E. (eds). The ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 26–78.

Igondová, E., Majzlan, O., 2015. Assemblages of ground beetles (Carabidae, Coleoptera) in peatland habitat, surrounding dry pine forests and meadows. Folia Oecologica, 42: 21–28.

Jiménez, J.J., Decaëns, T., Rossi, J.P., 2006. Stability of the spatio-temporal distribution and niche overlap in neotropical earthworm assemblages. Acta Oecologica, 30 (3): 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2006.06.008

Jiménez, J.J., Decaëns, T., Rossi, J.-P., 2012. Soil environmental heterogeneity allows spatial co-occurrence of competitor earthworm species in a gallery forest of the Colombian ‘Llanos’. Oikos, 121: 915–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20428.x

Jiménez, J. J., Decaëns, T., Lavelle, P., Rossi, J.-P., 2014. Dissecting the multi-scale spatial relationship of earthworm assemblages with soil environmental variability. BMC Ecology, 14:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-014-0026-4

Jorgensen, H.B., Elmholt, S., Petersen, H., 2003. Collembolan dietary specialisation on soil grown fungi. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 39: 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-003-0674-6

Karpachevsky, L.O., 2005. Ekologicheskoe pochvovedenie [Ecological pedology]. Moscow: Geos. 336 p.

Kirby, K.N., Gerlanc, D., 2013. BootES: an R package for bootstrap confidence intervals on effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45: 905–927. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0330-5

Krivolutsky, D.A., 1994. Pochvennaya fauna v ekologicheskom kontrole [Soil fauna in ecological control]. Moskva: Nauka. 240 p.

Laliberte, E., Paquette, A., Legendre, P., Bouchard, A., 2009. Assessing the scale-specific importance of niches and other spatial processes on beta diversity: a case study from a temperate forest. Oecologia, 159: 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1214-8

Lawton, J., 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 84: 177–192 https://doi.org/10.2307/3546712

Lazorík, M., Kula, E., 2015. Impact of weather and habitat on the occurrence of centipedes, millipedes and terrestrial isopods in mountain spruce forests. Folia Oecologica, 42: 103–112.

Legendre, P., 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74: 1659–1673. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939924

Legendre, P., Borcard, D., Peres-Neto, P.R., 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecological Monographs, 75: 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0549

Legendre, P., Mi, X., Ren, H., Ma, K., Yu, M., Sun, I.-F., He, F., 2009. Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broadleaved forest of China. Ecology, 90: 663–674 https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1880.1

Maraun, M., Martens, H., Migge, S., Theenhaus, A., Scheu, S., 2003. Adding to ‘the enigma of soil animal diversity’: fungal feeders and saprophagous soil invertebrattes prefer similar food substrates. European Journal of Soil Biology, 39: 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(03)00006-2

Mathieu, J., Rossi, J.P., Grimaldi, M., Mora, P., Lavelle, P., Rouland, C., 2004. A multi-scale study of soil macrofauna biodiversity in Amazonian pastures. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 40: 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0777-8

McArdle, B.H., Anderson, M.J., 2004. Variance heterogeneity, transformations and models of species abundance: a cautionary tale. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61: 1294–1302. https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-051

Nekola, J.C., 2003. Large-scale terrestrial gastropod community composition patterns in the Great Lakes region of North America. Diversity and Distributions, 9: 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00165.x

Ondina, P., Hermida, J., Outeiro, A., Mato, S., 2004. Relationships between terrestrial gastropod distribution and soil properties in Galicia (NW Spain). Applied Soil Ecology, 26 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.008

Pennisi, B. V., van Iersel, M., 2002. 3 ways to measure medium EC. GMPro, 22 (1): 46–48.

Polláková, N., Šimanský, V., Jonczak, J., 2017. Characteristics of physical properties in soil profiles under selected introduced trees in the Nature Reserve Arboretum Mlyňany, Slovakia. Folia Oecologica, 44: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/foecol-2017-0010

R Core Team, 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [cit. 2017-10-04]. https://www.R-project.org/.

Raunkier, C., 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p.

Rossi, J.P., 2003. Clusters in earthworm spatial distribution. Pedobiologia, 47 (5–6): 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00218

Rossi, J.-R., Lavelle, P., Tondoh, J.E., 1996. Statistical tool for soil biology. XI. Autocorrelogram and Mantel test. European Journal of Soil Biology, 32: 195–203.

Saetre, P., 1999. Spatial patterns of ground vegetation, soil microbial biomass and activity in a mixed spruce-birch stand. Ecography, 22: 183–192 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00467.x

Schneider, K., Migge, S., Norton, R.A., Scheu, S., Langel, R., Reineking, A., Maraun, M., 2004. Trophic niche differentiation in soil microarthropods (Oribatida, Acari): evidence from stable isotope ratios (N-15/N-14). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36: 1769–1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.033

Schoener, T.W., 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185 (4145): 27–39.17779277 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4145.27

Siefert, A., Ravenscroft, C., Weiser, M.D., Swenson, N.G., 2013. Functional beta-diversity patterns reveal deterministic community assembly processes in eastern North American trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 6: 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12030

Soinenen, J., Lennon, J.J., Hillebrand, H., 2007. A multivariate analysis of beta diversity across organisms and environments. Ecology, 88: 2830–2838.18051652 https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1730.1

Stašiov, S., Svitok, M., 2014. The influence of stand density on the structure of centipede (Chilopoda) and millipede (Diplopoda) communities in the submountain beech forest. Folia Oecologica, 41: 195–201.

Takeda, H., 1987. Dynamics and maintenance of Collembolan community structure in a forest soil system. Researches on Population Ecology, 29: 291–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538892

Tarasov, V.V., 2012. Flora Dnipropetrovs’koi’ ta Zaporiz’koi’ oblastej. Sudynni roslyny. Biologo-ekologichna harakterystyka vydiv [Flora of Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhya regions. Vascular plants. Biological and ecological characteristics of the species]. Dnipropetrovsk: Dnipropetrovsk University Press. 296 p.

Tsatsenkin, I.A., 1970. Ekologicheskaya otsenka kormovykh ugodiy Karpat i Balkan po rastitel’nomu pokrovu [Ecological evaluation of the fodder lands of the Carpathians and the Balkans on vegetation]. Moscow: Institute of Forages. 192 p.

Vadunina, A. F., Korchagina, S.A., 1986. Metody issledovaniya fizicheskikh svoĭstv pochv [Methods for research of physical properties of the soil]. Moskva: Agropromizdat. 416 p.

Viketoft, M., 2013. Determinants of small-scale spatial patterns: importance of space, plants and abiotics for soil nematodes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 62: 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.03.012

Wardle, D.A., 2006. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 9: 870–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00931.x

Warren, M.W., Zou, X., 2002. Soil macrofauna and litter nutrients in three tropical tree plantations on a disturbed site in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecology and Management, 170: 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00770-8

Whalen, J.K., 2004. Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworm patches in corn field, hayfield and forest systems of southwestern Quebec, Canada. Applied Soil Ecology, 27 (2): 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.04.004

Whittaker, R.H., 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs, 30: 279–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943563

Whittaker, R.H., 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxonomy, 21: 213–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1218190

Widenfalk, L.A., Bengtsson, J., Berggren, Å., Zwiggelaar, K., Spijkman, E., Huyer-Brugman, F., Berg, M.P., 2015. Spatially structured environmental filtering of collembolan traits in late successional salt marsh vegetation. Oecologia, 179 (2): 537–549.456800726001605 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3345-z

Wilson, J.B., Habiba, G., 1995. Limitation to species coexistence: evidence for competition from field observations, using a patch model. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6: 369–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236236

Yorkina, N., Maslikova, K., Kunah, O., Zhukov, O., 2018. Analysis of the spatial organization of Vallonia pulchella (Muller, 1774) ecological niche in Technosols (Nikopol manganese ore basin, Ukraine). Ecologica Montenegrina, 17: 29–45. https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2018.17.5

Zhukov, A., Zadorozhnaya, G., 2016. Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of a typical chernozem: the ecological approach. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35: 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0021

Zhukov, A.V., 2015. Foromorfy v sisteme ekomorf pochvennykh zhivotnykh [Phoromorphs in the ecomorph system of soil animals]. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Biology, 25: 254–266.

Zhukov, A.V., Kunakh, O.N., Novikova, V.A., 2015. Ekomorficheskaya organizaciya soobshchestv mezopedobiontov dubnyaka so svezhim raznotrav’em na arene r. Dnepr [The ecomorphic organization of the mesopedobiont community of an oak forest with the fresh grass in arena of the Dnieper river]. The Kharkov Entomological Society Gazette, 23 (2): 39–53.

Zhukov, A.V., Shtirts, A.D., Zadorozhnaja, G.A., Kunah, O.N., 2013. Frakcionirovanie prostranstvennoj variacii soobshchestva pancirnyh kleshchej (Acari: Oribatida) v pochve sel’skohozyajstvennogo polya v usloviyah stepnoj zony Ukrainy [Fractionation of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) community spatial structure in the soil of an agricultural field in Ukraine’s steppe zone]. Problems of Ecology and Environmental Protection of Technogenic Region, 1 (13): 87–105.

Zhukov, O.V., Gubanova, N.L., 2015. Riznomanittya ta dynamika uhrupovan’ zemnovodnykh zaplavnykh ekosystem r. Samara-Dniprovs’ka [Diversity and dynamics of amphibians in floodplain ecosystems of the Samara river]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 23 (1): 66–73. https://doi.org/10.15421/011510

Zhukov, O.V., Kunah, O.M., Dubinina, Y.Y., Ganzha, D.S., 2017. Riznomanittya ta fitoindykatsiyni mozhlyvosti roslynnoho uhrupovannya [Diversity and phytoindication capacity of a plant community]. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 7 (4): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.15421/2017_90

Zhukov, O.V., Kunah, O.N., Novikova, V.A., 2016. Funkcional’naya struktura soobshchestva mezopedobiontov dernovo-borovoj pochvy areny r. Dnepr [The functional organisation of the mesopedobionts community of sod pinewood soils on arena of the river Dnepr]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 24 (1): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.15421/011604

Downloads

Published

2018-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles