Soil heterogeneity after recultivation: ecological aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2018-0005Keywords:
geostatistics, phytoindication, recultivation, soil heterogeneity, soil penetration resistanceAbstract
The study subject was the soil heterogeneity at a recultivation site Nikopol manganese-ore basin (Pokrov, Ukraine). The soils at the locality are sod lithogenic soils developed on gray-green clays. The study ran by applying soil penetration resistance indices. The penetration resistance was measured across a regular grid of 7 × 15 points (21 × 45 m). The distance between the measurement points was 3 m. The parameters were recorded at every 5 cm to a depth of 50 cm. The environmental parameters were determined by phytoindication. Geostatistical analysis showed the average level of spatial dependence of soil penetration resistance. According to the features of the profile variation in penetration resistance with the depth, the measurement points have been divided into three clusters. The clusters formed morphologically homogeneous soil areas. These areas significantly differed in their soil acidity and in nitrogen content in soil.
References
Anand, M., Tucker, B.C., Desrochers, R., 2002. Ecological monitoring of terrestrial ecosystem recovery from man-made perturbation: assessing community complexity. In Proceedings of the 10th International conference on modelling, monitoring and management of air pollution. Segovia, Spain, July 1–3, 2002. Southampton: WIT Press, p. 341–350.
Bajla, B.C., Minarik, J., 2003. Návrh metódy namerania okamžitej vlhkosti pôdy pri hrote penetrometra [Proposal of a method for measuring the instantaneous moisture content in soil proximate to the tip of penetrometer]. Acta Technologica Agriculturae, 6 (4): 93–96.
Baroni, G., Ortuani, B., Facchi, A., Gandolfi, C., 2013. The role of vegetation and soil properties on the spatio-temporal variability of the surface soil moisture in a maize-cropped field. Journal of Hydrology, 489: 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.007
Baveye, P.C., Laba, M., 2015. Moving away from the geostatistical lamppost: why, where, and how does the spatial heterogeneity of soils matter? Ecological Modelling, 298: 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.018
Bolenius, E., Bölenius, E., Rogstrand, G., Thylén L., 2006. On-the-go measurements of soil penetration resistance on a Swedish EutricCambisol. In Proceedings of the International Soil Tillage Research Organisation (ISTRO), 17th Triennial conference. Kiel, Germany, August 28–September 3, 2006. Kiel: ISTRO, p. 867–870.
Breemen, N., Finzi, A.C., 1998. Plant-soil interactions: ecological aspects and evolutionary implications. Biogeochemistry, 42: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2691-7_1
Brind’Amour, A., Boisclair, D., Dray, S., Legendre, P., 2011. Relationships between species feeding traits and environmental conditions in fish communities: a three-matrix approach. Ecological Applications, 21 (2): 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2178.1
Bussoher, W.J., Frederick, J.R., Baner, B.J., 2000. Timing effects of deep tillage on penetration resistance and wheat and soybean yield. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64 (3): 999–1003. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.643999x
Cambardella, C.A., Moorman, T.B., Novak, J.M., Parkin, T.B., 1994. Field scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050033x
Castrignano, A.D., De Giorgio, Fornaro, F, Vonella, A.V., 2004. 3D spatial variation of the soil impedance as affected by soil tillage. In Conserving soil and water for society: sharing solutions. Proceedings the 13th International Soil Conservation Organisation Conference. Brisbane, 4–9th July. Paper no 744, 5p.
Cecilia, M., Jesus, H. C., Cortes, C.A., 2012. Soil penetration resistance analysis by multivariate and geostatistical methods. Engenharia Agricola, Jaboticabal, 32: 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162012000100010
Demidov, A.A., Kobets, A.S., Gritsan, Y.I., Zukov, A.V., 2013. Prostranstvennaya agroekologiya i rekultivatsiya zemel [Spatial agroecology and land reclamation: monograph]. Dnepropetrovsk: Svidler A.L. 560 p.
Diacono, M., Benedetto, D., Castrignanò, А., Rubinoa, Р., Vitti, С., Abdelrahman, Н.М., Sollitto, D., Cocozza, C., Ventrella, D., 2013. A combined approach of geostatistics and geographical clustering for delineating homogeneous zones in a durum wheat field in organic farming. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 64–65: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2013.03.001
Didukh,Ya.P., 2011. The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre. 176 p.
Didukh, Ya.P., 2012. Osnovy bioindykatsii [Fundamentals of bioindication]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. 344 p.
Dray, S., Legendre, P., Peres-Neto, P., 2006. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbours matrices (PCNM). Ecological Modelling, 196: 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015
Grunwald, S., McSweeney, K., Rooney, D.J., Lowery B., 2001. Soil layer models created with profile cone penetrometer data. Geoderma, 1103 (1–2): 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00076-3
Hamza, M.A., Anderson, W.K., 2001. Soil compaction in cropping systems: a review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil and Tillage Research, 82 (2): 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009
Herrick, J.E., Jones, T.L., 2002. A dynamic cone penetrometer for measuring soil penetration resistance. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66: 1320–1324. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1320
Heuvelink, G.B.M., Webster, R., 2001. Modelling soil variation: past, present, and future. Geoderma, 100: 269–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00025-8
Jiménez Juan, J., Decaëns, T., Lavelle, P., Rossi, J., 2014. Dissecting the multi-scale spatial relationship of earthworm assemblages with soil environmental variability. BMC Ecology, 14: 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-014-0026-4
Kremer, A.M., 1970. Neodnorodnosti pochvennogo pokrova kak samoorganizuyushchiesya sistemy [The heterogeneity of the soil cover as self-organizing systems]. In Zakonomernosti prostranstvennogo varirovaniya svoystv pochv i informatsionno-statisticheskie metody ih izucheniya. Moskva, p. 68–80.
Legendre, P., Fortin, M.J., 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio, 80: 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048036
Lipies, J., Hatano, H., 2003. Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth. Geoderma, 116 (1–2): 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00097-1
Lowery, B., Morrison, J.E., 2002. Soil penetrometers and penetrability. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 4, Physical methods. Soil Science Society of America book series, 5. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, p. 363–388.
Matveev, N.M., 2003. Optimizatsiya sistemyi ekomorf rasteniy A.L. Belgarda v tselyah indikatsii ekotopa i biotopa [Optimization of the system of plant ecomorphs Bel’gard for the purpose of indicating the ecotope and biotope]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University: Biology, Ecology, 11 (2): 105–113.
Medvedev, V.V., 2010. Neodnorodnost kak zakonomernoe proyavlenie gorizontalnoy strukturyi pochvennogo pokrova [Heterogeneity as natural display of horizontal structure of a soil cover]. Gruntoznavstvo, 11 (1–2): 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/JDT.2010.2093713
Mouillot, D., Spatharis, S., Reizopoulou, S. T., Laugier, L., Sabetta, A., Basset, T., Do Chi., T., 2006. Alternatives to taxonomic-based approaches to assess changes in transitional water communities. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16: 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.769
Nazarenko, N.N., 2016. Tsenomorfyi kak fitoindikatoryi biotopov [Coenomorphs as phytometers of biotopes]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University: Biology, Ecology, 24 (1): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.15421/011602
Paračkova, A. Zaujec, A., 2001. Evaluation of human impacts on soils on the Borska lowland. Ekológia (Bratislava), 20 (3): 299–304.
Polláková, N., Šimanský, V., Jonczak, J., 2017. Characteristics of physical properties in soil profiles under selected introduced trees in the Nature Reserve Arboretum Mlyňany, Slovakia. Folia Oecologica, 44: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/foecol-2017-0010
Rad, J.E, Valadi, G., Zargaran, M.R., 2017. Effect of man-made disturbances on understory plant richness of oak forests in Iran. Folia Oecologica, 44: 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/foecol-2017-0008
Rode, A.A., 1984. Genezis pochv i sovremennyie protsessyi pochvoobrazovaniya [Genesis of soils and modern soil formation processes]. Moskva: Nauka. 256 p.
Tarasov, V.V., 2005. Flora Dnipropetrovskoi i Zaporizkoi oblastei [Flora of the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia regions]. Lira: DNU. 276 p.
Tužinský, L., Bublinec, E., Tužinský, M., 2017. Development of soil water regime under spruce stands. Folia Oecologica, 44: 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/foecol-2017-0006
Topp, G.C., Lapena, D.R., Edwards, M.J., Young, G.D., 2003. Laboratory calibration, in-field validation and use of a soil penetrometer measuring cone resistance and water content. Vadose Zone, 2: 633–641. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2003.6330
Travleev, A.P., Belova, N.A. Balalayev, A.K., 2008. Ekologiya pochvoobrazovaniya lesnyih chernozemov [Ecology of the forest chernozems formation]. Gruntiznavstvo, 9 (1–2): 19–29.
Vachel, J., Ehrlich, P., 1988. Využití penetrometrické metody měrení pevnosti zemin v průzkumech pro odvodnění [Using penetrometry in assessment of soil resistance in surveys performed for draining purposes]. Vědecké práce Výzkumného ústavu pro zúrodnění zemědělských půd, 5: 131–140.
Valbuena Calderon, C.A., Martines, L.J., Giraldo Henao, R., 2008. Variabilidad especial del suelo y surelacion con el rendimiento de mango (Mangifera indica L.) [Spatial variability of soil properties and yield relationship in a mango crop (Mangifera indica L.)]. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, Jaboticabal, 30 (4): 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452008000400049
Vanags, C., Minasny, В., McBratney, A.B., 2004. The dynamic penetrometer for assessment of soil mechanical resistance. In Supersoil 2004. Proceeding of the 3th Australian New Zealand Conference. [cit. 2017-9-12]. http://www.regional.org.au/au/asssi/supersoil2004/s14/poster/1565_vanagsc.htm.
Verones Junior, V., Carvalho, M.P., Dafonte, J., Freddi, O.S., Vidal Vazquez, E. Ingaramo, O.E., 2006. Spatial variability of soil water content and mechanical resistance of Brazilian ferralsol. Soil and Tillage Research, 85 (1–2): 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.01.018
Webster, R., Oliver, M.A., 2007. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientist. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 318 р. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470517277
Yeterevska, L.V., Stammerer, G.F., Kanash A.P., 2008. Rekultyvovani grunty pidkhody do klasyfikatsii i systematyky [Recultivated soils approaches to classification and taxonomy]. Gruntiznavstvo, 9 (3–4): 147–150 p.
Young, G.D., Adams, B.A., Topp, G.C., 2000. A portable data collection system for simultaneous cone penetrometer force and volumetric soil water content measurements. Journal of Soil Science, 80: 23–31. https://doi.org/10.4141/S99-025
Zadorozhna, G.O., 2017. Soil ecomorphs as form of adaptation to the conditions of biogeocenosis. Scientific Bulletin Eastern National University named after Lesya Ukrainian. Series: Biological Sciences, 17 (342): 94–102. https://doi.org/10.29038/2617-4723-2017-356-7-94-103
Zahradniček, J., Beran, P., Pulkrabek, J., Svachula, B., Faměra, O., Sroller, J., Chochola, J., 2001. The effect of physical soil properties on metabolism and technological quality of sugar beet. Rostlinná Výroba, 47 (1): 23–27.
Zhukov, A., Zadorozhnaya, G., 2016. Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of atypical chernozem: the ecological aproach. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35 (3): 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0021
Zhukov, A.O., Zadorozhna, G.O., Maslikova, K.P., Andrusevich, K.V., Lyadska, I.V., 2017. Ekolohiya tekhnozemiv [Ecology of technosems]. Dnepr: Zhurfond. 444 p.
Zhukov, A.V., 2015. Fitoindykatsiine otsiniuvannia vymiriv, oderzhanykh za dopomohoiu bahatovymirnoho shkaliuvannia struktury roslynnoho uhrupovannia [Phytoindicative estimation of measurements obtained with multidimensional scaling of the plant community structure]. Chornomorskyi Botanichnyi Zhurnal, 1 (11): 84–95. https://doi.org/10.14255/2308-9628/15.111/8
Zhukov, A.V., Zadorojhna, G.O., Lyadskaya, I.V., 2014. Fizychni vlastyvosti rekultozemiv Nikopolskoho marhantsevorudnoho basseinu [Physical properties of the rekultozems of the Nikopolsky manganese-ore basin]. Pytannia Stepovoho Lisoznavstva ta Lisovoi Rekultyvatsii Zemel, 43: 93–102.
Zhukov, A.V., Zadorozhna, G.A., 2016. Prostranstvenno-vremennaya dinamika tverdosti rekultivirovannyih pochv, sformirovannyih v rezultate dobyichi poleznyih iskopaemyih otkryityim sposobom [Spatio-temporal dynamics of the recultivated soils penetration resistance formed after open mining]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University: Biology, Ecology, 24 (2): 324–331. https://doi.org/10.15421/011642
Zhukov, А.V., Zadorozhnaya, G.A., 2015. Otsenka ecomorphogenesa pedozema y chernozema obyknovennoho na osnove pokazatelei tverdosty [Pedozem and chernozem ecomorphogenesis assessment by soil penetration resistance data]. Ahrokhimiya i Gruntoznavstvo, 84: 72–80.
Zhukov, A.V., Zadorozhnaya, G.A., Andrusevich, K.V., 2012. Ekolohicheskiie kharakteristiki pedonov diernovo-litohiennykh pochv na lesakh [Ecological characteristics of the pedons of soddy-lithogenic soils on loess]. Visnyk DDAU, 2: 9–11.
Zhukov, O.V., Kunah, O.M., 2011. Tverdost dernovo-litogennyih pochv na lessovidnyih suglinkah [Penetration resistance of sod-lithogenic soils on loesslike loams]. Visnyk DDAU, 1: 63–69.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights except for commercial rights (transfer of commercial rights) and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
