Dispersion of the epigeic fauna groups in the agricultural landscape

Authors

  • Vladimír Langraf Department of Zoology and Anthropology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra Author
  • Kornélia Petrovičová Department of Environment and Zoology, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra Author
  • Zuzana Krumpálová Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra Author
  • Andrea Svoradová Research Institute for Animal Production in Nitra, National Agricultural and Food Centre Author
  • Janka Schlarmannová Department of Zoology and Anthropology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2021-0015

Keywords:

agriculture, epigeic groups, Slovakia, spatial modelling

Abstract

Changes in the structure of epigeic animal groups indicate ecological stability, which are influenced by urbanization, agriculture, and forestry. The aim of the paper was to assess the impact of agrarian land in the vicinity of urban and suburban landscape and non-fragmented forest in the vicinity of rural landscape on the occurrence of epigeic groups. We recorded the pitfall traps - 19, 676 individuals belonging to 20 taxonomic groups at 9 localities representing 7 types of habitat. Our results indicate a year-on-year increase in the number of individuals of epigeic groups in the city, with surrounding agrarian land. We found a correlation between eudominant epigeic groups of Aranea and Hymenoptera and rural landscape with the non-fragmented surrounding. Coleoptera has shown a link between the conditions of urban and suburban landscape with the surrounding developed agriculture. We confirmed a statistically significant effect for luminosity (p = 0.002), humidity (p = 0.025) and pH (p = 0.017).

References

Alberti, M., Marzluff, J., Hunt, V.M., 2017. Urban driven phenotypic changes: empirical observations and theoretical implications for eco-evolutionary feedback. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372: 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0029

Altieri, M.A., Nicholls, C.I., Henao, A., Lana, M.A., 2015. Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35: 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2

Baranová, B., Fazekašová, D., Jászay, T., Manko, P., 2013. Ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) community of arable land with different crops. Folia Faunistica Slovaca, 18: 21–29.

Bavec, M., Bavec, F. 2014. Impact of organic farming on biodiversity. In Lo, Y.H., Blanco, J.A., Shovonlal, R. (eds). Biodiversity in ecosystems. Linking structure and function. Rijeka: Intech, p. 185–202. https://doi.org/10.5772/58974

Brussard, L., Ruiter, P.C., Brown, G.G., 2007. Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121: 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013

Boháč, J., Jahnová, Z., 2015. Land use changes and lanscape degradation in Central and Eastern Europe in the last decades: epigeic invertebrates as bioindicators of landscape changes. In Armon, R., Hanninen, O. (eds). Environmental indicators. Dordrecht: Springer, p. 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9499-2_24

Carcamo, H.A., Spence, J.R., 1994. Crop type effects on the activity and distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Environmental Entomology, 23: 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/23.3.684

Černý, i., PaČuta, V., ernst, D., marek, J., gažo, J., Šulík, r., BuŠo, r., 2019. Yield and quality of sugar beet depending on variety and growing conditions of year. Listy Cukrovarnícke a Řepařské, 135: 204–208.

Eliášová, M., Šiška, B., Kollár, J., Ďuricová, V., 2019. Vplyv poveternostných podmienok na formovanie spoločenstiev bystrušiek rodu Carabus na lesnom stanovišti na lokalite Bábsky les [The influence of weather condition on the forming of carabus beetles coenoses on the forest stand at the locality Bábsky les]. In Rožnovský, J., Litschmann, T. (eds). Extrémy počasí, jejich dopady a bezpečnostní rizika. Broumov, 8. – 10. 10. 2019. Praha: Český hydrometeorologický ústav, p. 21–27.

Fazekašová, D., Bobuľovská, L., 2012. Soil organisms as an indicator of quality and environmental stress in the soil ecosystem. Životné Prostredie, 46: 103–106.

Gormsen, D., Hedlung, K., Wang, H.F., 2006. Diversity of soil mite communities when managing plant communities on set-aside arable land. Applied Soil Ecology, 31: 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.03.001

Holecová, M., Lukáš, J., Harakaľová, E., 2003. Mravce (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) dubovo-hrabových lesov v okolí Bratislavy (JZ Slovensko) [Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of oak-hornbeam forest in a vicinity of Bratislava (SW Slovakia)]. Folia Faunistica Slovaca, 8: 63–69.

Jasinski, M., Twardowski, J., Tendziagolska, E., 2016. The occurrence of soil mesofauna in organic crops. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 61: 193–199.

Kalivoda, H., Petrovič, F., Kalivodová, E., Kürthy, A., 2010. Influence of the landscape structure on the butterfly (Lepidoptera, Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea) and bird (Aves) taxocoenoses in Vel’ké Leváre (SW Slovakia). Ekológia (Bratislava), 29: 337–359. https://doi.org/10.4149/ekol_2010_04_337

Kozak, V.M., Romanenko, E.R., Brygadyrenko, V.V., 2020. Influence of herbicides, insecticides and fungicides on food consumption and body weight of Rossiulus kessleri (Diplopoda, Julidae). Biosystems Diversity, 28: 272–280. https://doi.org/10.15421/012036

Krumpálova, Z., 2002. Epigeic spiders (Araneae) of one Middle Danube floodplain forest. Biologia, Bratislava, 57: 161–169.

Krumpálova, Z., Krumpál, M., ŠtrBík, I., 2009. Classification of epigeic spiders (Araneae) at the western part of the Carpathians (Slovakia). Biologia, Bratislava, 64: 116–123. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0018-6

Lenoir, L., Lennartsson, T., 2010. Effects of timing of grazing on arthropod communities in semi-natural grasslands. Journal of Insect Science, 10: 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.6001

Litavský, J., Stašiov, S., Svitok, M., Michalková, E., Majzlan, O., Žarnovičan, H., Fedor, P., 2018. Epigeon communities of harvestmen (Opiliones) in Pannonian Basin floodplain forests: an interaction with environmental parameters. Biologia, Bratislava, 73: 753–763. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-0084-8

Lövei, G.L., Sunderland, K.D., 1996. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 41: 231–256.15012329 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001311

Magura, T., Ferrante, M., Lövei, L.G., 2020. Only habitat specialists become smaller with advancing urbanization. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29: 1978–1987. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13168

Majzlan, O., 2009. Bezchordáty a chordáty [Non-chordates and chordates]. Bratislava: Danubiaprint, a.s. 286 p.

Microsoft SQL Server 2017. (RTM) - 14.0.1000.169 (X64) Aug 22 2017 17:04:49 Copyright (C) 2017 Microsoft Corporation Express Edition (64-bit) on Windows 10 Home 10.0 (Build 18362:).

Novák, K., Balát, F., Bartoš, E., Bouček, Z., Daniel, M., Dlabola, J., Doskočil, J., Holman, J., Hrbáček, J., Agemann, E., Kunst, M., Landa, V., Lang, J., Mařan, J., Miller, F., Nosek, J., Novák, K., Obenberger, J., Obr, S., Pelikán, J., Raušer, J., Rosický, B., Rusek, J., Schwarz, J., Skuhravý, V., Slouková, M., Šilhavý, V., Štys, P., Teyrovský, V., Vondráček, K., Zahradník, J., Zelený, J., 1969. Metody sběru a preparace hmyzu [Methods for collecting and preserving insects]. Praha: Academia. 243 p.

Peterková, V., 2004. Dynamika výskytu bystruškovitých v alternatívnom spôsobe pestovania plodín [Dynamic of occurence of Carabidae in alternative soil utilization]. Acta Facultatis Paedagogicae Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. Séria. B – prírodné vedy, 8: 11–13.

Pokorný, V., Šifner, F., 2004. Atlas hmyzu [An atlas of insects]. Praha: Paseka. 221 p.

Porhajašová, J., 2017. Aktivita a priestorová štruktúra epigeických skupín v závislosti od aplikácie organických hnojív v podmienkach agroekosystémov [Activity and spatial distribution of epigeic groups depending on application of organic fertilizers under agroecosystem conditions]. Nitra: Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita. 61 p.

Porhajašová, J., Babošová, M., Noskovič, J., Ondrišík, P., 2018. Long-term developments and biodiversity in carabid and staphylinid (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Staphylinidae) fauna during the application of organic fertilizers under agroecosystem conditions. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27: 2229–2235. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/77072

Stanová, V., Valachovič, M. (eds), 2002. Katalóg biotopov Slovenska [Habitat catalogue of Slovakia]. Bratislava: DAPHNE – Inštitút aplikovanej ekológie. 225 p.

Statsoft, inc., 2004. Statistica Cz [Softwarový systém na analýzu dat]. Verze 7. [Data analysis software system]. Version 7. [cit. 2020-10-19]. http://www.statsoft.cz/

Swaminathan, R., 2014. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae): their potential as bioagents in agroecosystems. Basic and Applied Aspects of Biopesticides, 12: 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1877-7_12

Teofilova, T., 2021. The ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and their role as bio-agents. Forest Science. Special Issue, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.3897/abs.7.e67015

Ter Braak C.J.F., Šmilauer P., 2012. Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Ithaca USA: Microcomputer Power. 496 p.

Tieman, L.K., Grandy, A.S., Atkinson, E.E., Marin-Spiotta, E., McDaniel, M.D., 2015. Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in a agroecosystem. Ecology Letters, 18: 761–771.26011743 https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12453

Varvara, M., 2010. The genus Carabus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in some potato crops from Romania. Oltenia. Studii şi Comunicări Ştiinţele Naturii, 26: 137–146.

Vician, V., Stašiov, S., Kočík, K., Hazuchová, L., 2011. The structure of community Coleoptera: Carabidae on various farmed areas in the Podpoľanie region and their indication. Acta Facultatis Ecologiae, 24-25: 123–131.

Vician, V., Svitok, M., Kočík, K., Stašiov, S., 2015. The influence of agricultural management on the structure of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages. Biologia, Bratislava, 70: 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0028

Vician, V., Svitok, M., Michalková, E., Lukáčik, I., Stašiov, S., 2018. Influence of tree species and soil properties on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities. Acta Oecologica, 91: 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2018.07.005

Wagg, C., Bender, S.F., Widmer, F., Heijden, M.G.A., 2014. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111: 5266–5270. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320054111

Yadav, S., Singh, Y., Yadav, M.K., Babu, S., Singh, K., 2013. Effect of organic nutrient management in basmati rice (Oryza sativa) – based cropping systems. Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences, 5: 50–54.

Zimmerer, K.S., 2010. Biological diversity in agriculture and global change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35: 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-040309-113840

Downloads

Published

2021-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles