Acoustic ecology of tawny owl (Strix aluco) in the Greek Rhodope Mountains using passive acoustic monitoring methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2022-0012Keywords:
acoustic ecology, acoustic sensors, Strigiformes, vocal activityAbstract
Passive acoustic monitoring is a wildlife monitoring method used especially for the study of vocally active species which are difficult to observe directly. The tawny owl (Strix aluco, Linnaeus 1758) is such a species, and has not been previously studied in Greece. The aim of the study was to provide a first insight into the species’ acoustic ecology in the Rhodope Mountains by describing its calling activity at four sites over a period of 3–6 months, and to examine possible correlation with natural and climatic parameters. Based on 24,937 calls, we report a significant increase in the number of calls per night (18:00 pm to 9:00 am) as the length of the night increased, as well as a negative relation with wind speed. We did not observe a relationship between calling frequency and the phase of the moon.
References
Agostino, P.V., Lusk, N.A., Meck, W.H., Golombek, D.A., Peryer, G., 2020. Daily and seasonal fluctuation in Tawny Owl vocalization timing. PLOS ONE, 15: e0231591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231591
Balčiauskienė, L., Juškaitis, R., Atkočaitis, O., 2005. The diet of the Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) in South-Western Lithuania during the breeding period. Acta Zoologica Lituanica, 15: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13921657.2005.10512604
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv: 1406.5823 [stat], June. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bradbury, J.W., Vehrencamp, S.L., 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. 882 p.
Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R. (eds), 2002. Statistical theory and numerical results. In Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York, NY: Springer, p. 352–436.
Byrnes, J., 2008. [R-sig-ME] Coefficient of determination (R^2) when using lme(). [cit. 2022-3-22]. https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/2008q2/000713.html
Chaverri, G., Ancillotto, L., Russo, D., 2018. Social communication in bats. Biological Reviews, 93: 1938–1954. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12427
Choi, W., Lee, J.-H., Sung, H.-C., 2019. A case study of male tawny owl (Strix aluco) vocalizations in South Korea: call feature, individuality, and the potential use for census. Animal Cells and Systems, 23: 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2019.1592022
Colafrancesco, K.C., Gridi-Papp, M., 2016. Vocal sound production and acoustic communication in amphibians and reptiles. In Suthers, R.A., Fitch, W.T., Fay, R.R., Popper, A.N. (eds). Vertebrate sound production and acoustic communication. Handbook of Auditory Research, 53. Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 51–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27721-9_3
Cramp, S., 1985. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: terns to woodpeckers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 960 p.
Garcia, M., Favaro, L., 2017. Animal vocal communication: function, structures, and production mechanisms. Current Zoology, 63: 417–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zox040
Gibb, R., Browning, E., Glover-Kapfer, P., Jones, K.E., 2019. Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13101
Gryz, J., Chojnacka-Ożga, L., Krauze-Gryz, D., 2019. Long-term stability of Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) population despite varying environmental conditions – a case study from Central Poland. Polish Journal of Ecology, 67: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.3161/15052249PJE2019.67.1.006
Hartig, F., Lohse, L., 2022. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level /mixed) regression models.v. [cit.2022-03-18]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/vignettes/DHARMa.html
Lengagne, T., Slater, P.J.B., 2002. The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269: 2121–2125.169114112396486 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2115
Meredith, M., Ridout, M., 2021. Overview of the overlap package: May 17, 2021.[cit. 2021-08-08]. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/overlap/vignettes/overlap.pdf
Naguib, M., Titulaer, M., Waas, J.R., van Oers, K., Sprau, P., Snijders, L., 2022. Prior territorial responses and home range size predict territory defense in radio-tagged great tits. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 76: 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03143-3
Pérez-Granados, C., Schuchmann, K.-L., Marques, M.I., 2021. Vocal activity of the Ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum) is strongly correlated with moon phase and nocturnal temperature. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 33: 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2020.1820582
Pérez-Granados, C., Schuchmann, K.-L., Marques, M.I., 2022. Addicted to the moon: vocal output and diel pattern of vocal activity in two Neotropical nightjars is related to moon phase. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 34: 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2021.1886182
Peri, A., 2018. A comparison of three methods for planning a census of Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) populations living at high territorial density. Bioacoustics, 27: 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2017.1326164
Rand, Z.R., Wood, J.D., Oswald, J.N., 2022, Effects of duty cycles on passive acoustic monitoring of southern resident killer whale (Orcinus orca) occurrence and behavior. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 151: 1651–1660. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009752
Reid, D.S., Wood, C.M., Whitmore, S.A., Berigan, W.J., Keane, J.J., Sawyer, S.C., Shaklee, P.A., Kramer, H.A., Kelly, K.G., Reiss, A., Kryshak, N., Gutiérrez, R.J., Klinck, H., Peery, M.Z., 2021. Noisy neighbors and reticent residents: distinguishing resident from non-resident individuals to improve passive acoustic monitoring. Global Ecology and Conservation, 28: e01710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01710
Ridout, M.S., Linkie, M., 2009. Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14: 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1198/jabes.2009.08038
Sabol, A.C., Greggor, A.L., Masuda, B., Swaisgood, R.R., 2022. Testing the maintenance of natural responses to survival-relevant calls in the conservation breeding population of a critically endangered corvid (Corvus hawaiiensis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 76: 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03130-8
Shekhovtsov, S.M., Sharikov, A.V. 2015. Individual and geographical variation in the territorial calls of tawny owls Strix aluco in Eastern Europe. Ardeola, 62: 299–310. https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.62.2.2015.299
Shonfield, J., Bayne, E., 2017. Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 12: 14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00974-120114
Smith, W.J., 1977. The behavior of communicating: an ethological approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 558 p.
Soulsbury, C., Montealegre-Z, F., Elias, D,O., 2022. Evolutionary biomechanics of sound production and reception. Frontiers Ecology and Evolution, 9: 788711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.788711
Southern, H.N., 1970. The natural control of a population of Tawny owls (Strix aluco). Journal of Zoology, 162: 197–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1970.tb01264.x
Sugai, L.S.M., Silva, T.S.F., Ribeiro Jr., J.W., Llusia, D., 2019. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience, 69: 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy147
Zuberogoitia, I., Burgos, G., González-Oreja, J.A., Morant, J., Martínez, J.E., Albizua, J.Z., 2019. Factors affecting spontaneous vocal activity of Tawny Owls Strix aluco and implications for surveying large areas. Ibis, 161: 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12684
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights except for commercial rights (transfer of commercial rights) and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
