Biodiversity in cities: the impact of biodiversity data across spatial scales on diversity estimates

Authors

  • C.X. Garzon Lopez Knowledge Infrastructures, Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen Author
  • Gabija Savickytė Knowledge Infrastructures, Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2023-0012

Keywords:

arthropods, birds, GBIF, mammals, Netherlands, spatial scale, urban biodiversity

Abstract

The assessment and monitoring of biodiversity in urban areas has been shown to have enormous potential to inform integrative urban planning in cities. In this context, digital biodiversity repositories such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) has been promoted for its central role in gathering and harmonizing biodiversity data worldwide, thereby facilitating these assessments and monitoring efforts. While GBIF data has been investigated for its potential at a large scale and in natural ecosystems, the question remains as to what extent, and in which context, is GBIF data applicable to urban biodiversity assessment and monitoring? In this study, we assessed the spatial patterns of biodiversity, by exploring species richness patterns in relation to land use types for three taxonomic groups (birds, mammals and arthropods) in three cities in The Netherlands (Rotterdam, Amsterdam and Groningen) at multiple spatial scales. We found significant variation in the effect of land uses on the species richness patterns, in terms of taxonomic group, spatial configuration and land cover type, and across spatial scales. Our study demonstrates the potential of GBIF data while highlighting the importance of the careful selection of one or multiple spatial scales, especially in relation to the taxonomic group characteristics and ecology and the spatial configuration of the cities studied.

References

Alizadeh, M.R., Abatzoglou, J.T., Adamowski, J.F., Prestemon, J.P., Chittoori, B., Akbari Asanjan, A., Sadegh, M., 2022. Increasing heat stress inequality in a warming climate. Earth’s Future, 10 (2): e2021EF002488. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ef002488

Angold, P.G., Sadler, J.P., Hill, M.O., Pullin, A., Rushton, S., Austin, K., Small, E., Wood, B., Wadsworth, R., Sanderson, R., Thompson, K., 2006. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Science of the Total Environment, 360 (1–3): 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.035

Annerstedt van den Bosch, M., Mudu, P., Uscila, V., Barrdahl, M., Kulinkina, A., Staatsen, B., Swart, W., Kruize, H., Zurlyte, I., Egorov, A.I., 2015. Development of an urban green space indicator and the public health rationale. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 44 (2): 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494815615444

Apfelbeck, B., Snep, R., Hauck, T.E., Ferguson, J., Holy, H., Jakoby, M., MacIvor, J., Schär, L., Taylor, M., Weisser, W.W., 2020. Designing wildlife-inclusive cities that support human-animal co-existence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200: 103817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103817

Aronson, M.F., La Sorte, F.A., Nilon, C.H., Katti, M., Goddard, M.A., Lepczyk, C.A., Warren, P.S., Williams, N.S., Cilliers, S., Clarkson, B., Dobbs, C., Dolan, R., Hedblom, M., Klotz, S., Kooijmans, J.L., Kühn, I., Macgregor-Fors, I., McDonnell, M., Mörtberg, U., Pysek, P., Siebert, S., Sushinsky, J., Werner, P., Winter, M., 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences, 281 (1780): 20133330. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3330

Aronson, M., Lepczyk, C.A., Evans, K.L., Goddard, M.A., Lerman, S.B., MacIvor, J.S., Nilon, C.H., Vargo, T., 2017. Biodiversity in the city: key chal lenges for urban green space management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15 (4): 189–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1480

Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X., 2019. Urban green space, tree canopy, and prevention of heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes: a longitudinal study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 3, Suppl. 1: S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(19)30159-7

Aznarez, C., Svenning, J.-C., Taveira, G., Baró, F., Pascual., U., 2022. Wildness and habitat quality drive spatial patterns of urban biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 228: 104570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104570

Balaban, O., 2012. Climate change and cities: a review on the impacts and policy responses. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 29 (1): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2012.1.2

Baldock, K.C.R., Goddard, M.A., Hicks, D.M., Kunin, W.E., Mitschunas, N., Osgathorpe, L.M., Potts, S.G., Robertson, K.M., Scott, A.V., Stone, G.N., Vaughan, I.P., Memmott, J., 2015. Where is the UK’s pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences, 282 (1803): 20142849. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2849

Barbosa, A.M., Pautasso, M., Figueiredo. D., 2013. Species– people correlations and the need to account for survey effort in biodiversity analyses. Diversity and Distributions, 19 (9): 1188–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12106

Bartoň, K., 2020. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. [cit. 2023-02-14]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

Beaugeard, E., Brischoux, F., Angelier, F., 2020. Green infrastructures and ecological corridors shape avian biodiversity in a small French city. Urban Ecosystems, 24 (3): 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01062-7

Beaugeard, E., Brischoux, F., Angelier, F., 2021. Green infrastructures and ecological corridors shape avian biodiversity in a small French city. Urban Ecosystems, 24 (3): 549–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01062-7

Beck, J., Böller, M., Erhardt, A., Schwanghart, W., 2014. Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modeling species’ geographic distributions. Ecological Informatics, 19: 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.002

Beninde, J., Veith, M., Hochkirch, A., 2015. Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecology Letters, 18 (6): 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12427

Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E., Gomez-Rubio, V., 2013. Applied spatial data analysis with R. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. [cit. 2023-02-11]. http://www.asdar-book.org/

Braaker, S., Ghazoul, J., Obrist, M.K., Moretti, M., 2014. Habitat connectivity shapes urban arthropod communities: the key role of green roofs. Ecology, 95 (4): 1010–1021. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0705.1

Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. 488 p.

Chakraborty, T., Hsu, A., Manya, D., Sheriff, G., 2019. Disproportionately higher exposure to urban heat in lower-income neighborhoods: a multi-city perspective. Environmental Research Letters, 14 (10): 105003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3b99

Checker, M., 2011. Wiped out by the “Greenwave”: environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City & Society, 23 (2): 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744x.2011.01063.x

Chen, G., Li, X., Liu, X., Chen, Y., Liang, X., Leng, J., Xu, X., Liao, W., Qiu, Y., Wu, Q., Huang, K., 2020. Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nature Communications, 11 (1): 537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14386-x

Comber, A., Brunsdon, C., Green, E., 2008. Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86 (1): 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002

Concepción, E.D., Moretti, M., Altermatt, F., Nobis, M.P., Obrist, M.K, 2015. Impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity: the role of species mobility, degree of specialisation and spatial scale. Oikos, 124 (12): 1571–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02166

Condit, R., 2000. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science, 288 (5470): 1414–1418. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5470.1414

Cooper, D.S., Wood, E.M., Katz, N.D., Superfisky, K., Osborn, F., Novoselov, A., Tarczynski, J., Bacasen, L.K., 2021. Large cities fall behind in “Neighborhood Biodiversity”. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 2: 734931. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2021.734931

Czamanski, D., 2008. Urban sprawl and ecosystems — can nature survive? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2 (4): 321–366. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000019

Das, M., Das, A., Pereira, P., 2023. Developing an integrated urban ecological efficiency framework for spatial ecological planning: a case on a tropical mega metropolitan area of the global south. Geoscience Frontiers, 14 (1): 101489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101489

De Carvalho, R.M., Szlafsztein, C.F., 2019. Urban vegetation loss and ecosystem services: the influence on climate regulation and noise and air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 245: 844–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.114

Dyderski, M.K., Paź, S., Frelich, L.E., Jagodziński, A.M., 2018. How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions? Global Change Biology, 24 (3): 1150–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13925

Driscoll, D.A., Banks, S.C., Barton, P.S., Lindenmayer, D.B., Smith, A.L., 2013. Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28 (10): 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.06.010

Elmqvist, T., Redman, C.L., Barthel, S., Costanza, R., 2013. History of urbanization and the missing ecology. In Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer, p. 13–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_2

European Union, Copernicus Land Monitoring Service 2018, European Environment Agency (EEA). Urban Atlas 2018. [cit. 2023-02-02]. https://land.copernicus.eu/local/urban-atlas/urban-atlas-2018

European Union, 2016. Urban Europe: statistics on cities, towns and suburbs: 2016 edition. Eurostat Statistical Books. Luxembourg: Publications Office. [cit. 2023-02-27]. https://op.europa.eu/publication/doi/10.2785/91120

European Commission, 2019. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. 640. [cit. 2023-02-08]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640&from=EN

Fenoglio, M.S., Rossetti, M.R., Videla, M., 2020. Negative effects of urbanization on terrestrial arthropod communities: a meta-analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29 (8): 1412–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13107

Ferenc, M., Sedláček, O., Fuchs, R., Dinetti, M., Fraissinet, M., Storch, D., 2014. Are cities different? Patterns of species richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species assemblages in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23 (4): 479–489.

Filazzola, A., Shrestha, N., MacIvor, J.S., 2019. The contribution of constructed green infrastructure to urban biodiversity: a synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56 (9): 2131–2143. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13475

Fournier, B., Frey, D., Moretti, M., 2020. The origin of urban communities: from the regional species pool to community assemblages in city. Journal of Biogeography, 47 (3): 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13772

Gallo, T., Fidino, F., Lehrer, E.W, Magle, S.B., 2017. Mammal diversity and metacommunity dynamics in urban green spaces: implications for urban wildlife conservation. Ecological Applications, 27 (8): 2330–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1611

Garrard, G.E., Williams, N.S.G., Mata, L., Thomas,J., Bekessy, S.A., 2018. Biodiversity sensitive urban design. Conservation Letters, 11 (2): e12411. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12411

Garzon-Lopez, C.X., Jansen, P.A., Bohlman, S.A., Ordonez, A., Olff, H., 2014. Effects of sampling scale on patterns of habitat association in tropical trees. Journal of Vegetation Science, 25 (2): 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12090

GBIF.org (26 July 2022) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.8xmjx9

GBIF.orgA (26 July 2022) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.k9gn29

GBIF.orgB (20 July 2022) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.s6uz7x

Gelman, A., Su, Y.-S. 2020. arm: data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. [cit. 2023-02-02]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arm

Gemeente Amsterdam, 2012. Ecologische visie, ecologie, biodiversiteit en groene verbindingen in Amsterdam [Ecological vision, ecology, biodiversity and green space connectivity in Amsterdam]. [cit. 2023-02-15]. https://www.publicspaceinfo.nl/media/uploads/files/AMSTERDAM_2012_0014.pdf

Gemeente Groningen, Strootman Landshapsarchitecten, 2020. Groenplan Groningen. Gemeente Groningen. 2018. Dit kun je doen - Groningen Klimaatbestendig. Groningen Klimaatbestendig [This is what you can do – Climate proof Groningen]. [cit. 2023-02-15]. https://groningenklimaatbestendig.nl/dit-kun-je-doen/

Gemeente Rotterdam, 2018. Collegetargets 2018–2022. Gemeente Rotterdam. [cit. 2023-02-15]. https://www.rotterdam.nl/bestuur-organisatie/collegetargets-2018-2022/

Gemeente Rotterdam, 2022. De finish Rotterdam gaat voor groen 2018–2022 [The finish of Rotterdam goes green]. [cit. 2023-02-15]. https://www.kanbouwen.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Gemeente-Rotterdam-Rotterdam-gaat-voor-groen-De-Finish.pdf

Gómez-Villarino, M.T., Gómez Villarino, M., Ruiz-Garcia, L., 2020. Implementation of urban green infrastructures in peri-urban areas: a case study of climate change mitigation in Madrid. Agronomy, 11 (1): 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010031

Grade, A.M., Warren, P.S., Lerman, S.B., 2022. Managing yards for mammals: mammal species richness peaks in the suburbs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 220 (April): 104337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104337

Grashof-Bokdam, C., 1997. Forest species in an agricultural landscape in the Netherlands: effects of habitat fragmentation. Journal of Vegetation Science, 8 (1): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3237238

GRASS Development Team, 2021. Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software, Version 8.0. Electronic document. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. [cit. 2023-02-28]. http://grass.osgeo.org

Guerry, A.D., Smith, J.R., Lonsdorf, E., Daily, G.C., Wang, X., Chun, Y., 2021. Urban nature and biodiversity for cities. Policy Briefing. Global Platform for Sustainable Cities, World Bank. Washington, DC.

Hursh, S. H., Bauder, J.M., Fidino, M., Drake, D., 2023. An urban cast of characters: landscape use and cover influencing mammal occupancy in an American midwestern city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 229: 104582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104582

Hegetschweiler, K.T., de Vries, S., Arnberger, A., Bell, S., Brennan, M., Siter, N., Olafsson, A.S., Voigt, A., Hunziker, M., 2017. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: a review of European studies. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21: 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ufug.2016.11.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j

Hughes, A., Orr, M., Ma, K., Costello, M., Waller, J., Provoost, P., Zhu, C., Qiao, H., 2021. Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world. Ecography, 44: 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05926

Ives, C.D., Lentini, P.E., Threlfall, C.G., Ikin, K., Shanahan, D.F., Garrard, G.E., Bekessy, S.A., Fuller, R.A., Mumaw, L., Rayner, L., Rowe, R., Valentine, L.E., Kendal, D., 2015. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25 (1): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12404

Jansen, J., Woolley, S.N.C., Dunstan, P.K., Foster, S.D., Hill, N.A, Haward, M., Johnson, C.R., 2022. Stop ignoring map uncertainty in biodiversity science and conservation policy. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 6 (7): 828–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01778-z

Kendal, D., Egerer, M., Byrne, J.A., Jones, P.J., Marsh, P., Threlfall, C.G., Allegretto, G., Kaplan, H., Nguyen, H.K., Pearson, S., Wright, A., 2020. City-size bias in knowledge on the effects of urban nature on people and biodiversity. Environmental Research Letters, 15 (12): 124035.

Knapp, S., Aronson, M.F., Carpenter, E., Herrera-Montes, A., Jung, K., Kotze, D.J., La Sorte, F.A., Lepczyk, C.A., MacGregor-Fors, I., MacIvor, J.S., Moretti, M., 2021. A research agenda for urban biodiversity in the global extinction crisis. Bioscience, 71 (3): 268–279.

Kowarik, I., 2011. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental Pollution, 159 (8–9): 1974–1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022

Kumar, P., 2021. Climate change and cities: challenges ahead. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.645613

La Sorte, F.A., Tingley, M.W., Hurlbert, A.H., 2014. The role of urban and agricultural areas during avian migration: an assessment of within-year temporal turnover. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23 (11): 1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12199

Lai, S., Leone, F., Zoppi, C., 2018. Implementing green infrastructures beyond protected areas. Sustainability, 10 (10): 3544. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103544

LaPoint, S., Balkenhol, N., Hale, J., Sadler, J., Ree, R., 2015. Ecological connectivity research in urban areas. Functional Ecology, 29 (7): 868–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12489

Lepczyk, C.A., Aronson, M.F.J., Evans, K.L., Goddard, M.A., Lerman, S.B., MacIvor. J.S., 2017. Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 67 (9): 799–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix079

Li, E., Parker, S.S, Pauly, G.B., Randal, J.M., Brown, B.V., Cohen, B.S., 2019. An urban biodiversity assessment framework that combines an urban habitat classification scheme and citizen science data. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00277

Liquete, C., Kleeschulte, S., Dige, G., Maes, J., Grizzetti, B., Olah, B., Zulian, G., 2015. Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: a Pan-European case study. Environmental Science & Policy, 54: 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.009

Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P., Hector, A., Hooper, D.U., Huston, M.A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Tilman, D., 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294 (5543): 804–808.

Lososová, Z., Čeplová, N., Chytrý, M., Tichý, L., Danihelka, J., Fajmon, K., Láníková, D., Preislerová, Z., Řehořek, V., 2016. Is phylogenetic diversity a good proxy for functional diversity of plant communities? A case study from urban habitats. Journal of Vegetation Science, 27 (5): 1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12414

Lucertini, G., Musco, F., 2020. Circular urban metabolism framework. One Earth, 2 (2): 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.004

Madureira, H., Andresen, T., 2013. Planning for multifunctional urban green infrastructures: promises and challenges. Urban Design International, 19 (1): 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.11

Opoku, A., 2019. Biodiversity and the built environment: implications for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141 (February): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.011

Ovaskainen, O., 2012. How to develop the nature conservation strategies for the Netherlands? De Levende Natuur, 114 (2): 59–62.

Proka, A., Hisschemöller, M., Loorbach, D., 2018. Transition without conflict? Renewable energy initiatives in the Dutch energy transition. Sustainability, 10 (6): 1721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061721

QGIS Development Team, 2020. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. [cit. 2023-02-24]. http://qgis.org

R Core Team, 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [cit. 2023-02-06]. https://www.R-project.org/

Rocchini, D., Garzon-Lopez, C.X., 2017. Cartograms tool to represent spatial uncertainty in species distribution. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 3: e12029

Ronchi, S., Salata, S., 2022. Insights for the enhancement of urban biodiversity using nature-based solutions: the role of urban spaces in green infrastructures design. In Mahmoud, I.H., Morello, E., Lemes de Oliveira, F., Geneletti, D. Nature-based solutions for sustainable urban planning: greening cities, shaping cities. Contemporary Urban Design Thinking. Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89525-9_3

Rudd, H., Vala, J., Schaefer, V., 2002. Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restoration Ecology, 10 (2): 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2002.02041.x

Schwarz, N., Moretti, M., Bugalho, M.N., Davies, Z.G., Haase, D., Hack, J., Hof, A., Melero, Y., Pett, T.J., Knapp, S., 2017. Understanding biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships in urban areas: a comprehensive literature review. Ecosystem Services, 27: 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.014

Seto, K.C., Dhakal, S., Bigio, A., Blanco, H., Delgado, G.C., Dewar, D., Huang, L., Inaba, A., Kansal, A., Lwasa, S., McMahon, J.E., Müller, D.B., Murakami, J., Nagendra, H., Ramaswami, A., 2014. Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning. In Eden-hofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J. C. (eds). Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, p. 923–1000. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415416.018

Sicard, P., Agathokleous, E., Marco, A.D., Paoletti, E., Calatayud, V., 2021. Urban population exposure to air pollution in Europe over the last decades. Environmental Sciences Europe, 33: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00450-2

Sturiale, L., Scuderi, A., 2019. The role of green infrastructures in urban planning for climate change adaptation. Climate, 7 (10): 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7100119

Sultana, M., Storch, I., 2021. Suitability of open digital species records for assessing biodiversity patterns in cities: a case study using avian records. Journal of Urban Ecology, 7 (1): juab014. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juab014

Sweet, F.S., Apfelbeck, B., Hanusch, M., Garland Monteagudo, C., Weisser, W.W., 2022. Data from public and governmental databases show that a large proportion of the regional animal species pool occurs in cities in Germany. Journal of Urban Ecology, 8 (1): juac002. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juac002

Taylor, L., Hochuli, D.F., 2014. Creating better cities: how biodiversity and ecosystem functioning enhance urban residents’ wellbeing. Urban Ecosystems, 18 (3): 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0427-3

van der Grift, E.A., 2005. Defragmentation in the Netherlands: a success story? GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 14 (2): 144–147. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.14.2.16

Watkins, S.L., Mincey, S.K., Vogt, J., Sweeney, S.P., 2016. Is planting equitable? An examination of the spatial distribution of nonprofit urban tree-planting programs by canopy cover, income, race, and ethnicity. Environment and Behavior, 49 (4): 452–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516636423

Wetzel, F.T., Bingham, H.C., Groom, Q., Haase, P., Kõljalg, U., Kuhlmann, M., Martin, C.S., Penev, L., Robertson, L., Saarenmaa, H., Schmeller, D.S., Stoll, S., Tonkin, J.D., Häuser, C.L., 2018. Unlocking biodiversity data: prioritization and filling the gaps in biodiversity observation data in Europe. Biological Conservation, 221 (May): 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.024

Wickham, H., 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Use R! Springer-Verlag New York.

Wolf, J.M., Jeschke, J.M., Voigt, C.C., Itescu, Y., 2022. Urban affinity and its associated traits: a global analysis of bats. Global Change Biology, 28: 5667–5682. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16320

Xie, Ch., Wang, J., Haase, D., Wellmann, T., Lausch, D., 2023. Measuring spatio-temporal heterogeneity and interior characteristics of green spaces in urban neighborhoods: a new approach using gray level co-occurrence matrix. Science of the Total Environment, 855: 158608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158608

Xu, F., Yan, J., Heremans, S., Somers, B., 2022. Pan-European urban green space dynamics: a view from space between 1990 and 2015. Landscape and Urban Planning, 226 (October): 104477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104477

Zardo, L., Geneletti, D., Pérez-Soba, M., Van Eupen, M., 2017. Estimating the cooling capacity of green infrastructures to support urban planning. Ecosystem Services, 26: 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.016

Zhou, Y., Varquez, A. C. G., Kanda, M., 2019. High-resolution global urban growth projection based on multiple applications of the SLEUTH urban growth model. Scientific Data, 6 (1): article number 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0048-z

Downloads

Published

2023-07-26

Issue

Section

Articles