Spring phenological models combining the effects of temperature and photoperiod are successfully transferred to various spatial and temporal scales: a case study of Aesculus hippocastanum L.

Authors

  • Svetlana Korsakova Nikitsky Botanical Gardens—National Scientific Center of the RAS; Laboratory of Regional Climate Systems, Sevastopol State University Author
  • Pavel Korsakov Nikitsky Botanical Gardens—National Scientific Center of the RAS; Crimean Department of Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring Author
  • Vladislav Evstigneev Laboratory of Regional Climate Systems, Sevastopol State University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2025-0003

Keywords:

climate change, flowering time, leaf miner, leaf unfolding, photosensitivity, temperature

Abstract

On the basis of long-term, high-quality in situ observations on phenological and meteorological data, we parameterised and examined the performances of four single-phase and two two-phase models for the prediction of the leaf unfolding and flowering dates of horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum L.). Amongst models, those combining the effects of temperature and photoperiod showed the best phenophase prediction, suggesting the influence of photoperiod on the leaf unfolding and flowering of A. hippocastanum. The obtained coefficients showed that the effect of photoperiod was greater on leaf unfolding than on flowering. Comprehensive assessment revealed that the single-phase BCdoy model demonstrated the best fitting for both phenophases. This model also showed sufficiently high accuracy and the transferability of results in time and space. The proposed models can be used to predict the spring phenophases of A. hippocastanum in European and Asian countries, where this ornamental tree species is widely used in urban landscaping, and to optimise control methods against Cameraria ohridella Deschka & Dimić (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae). For C. ohridella, the first flying out of adults after overwintering begins at the onset of horse chestnut leaf unfolding and mass flight occurs during the full flowering period.

References

Asse, D., Randin, Ch.F., Bonhomme, M., Delestrade, A., Chuine, I., 2020. Process-based models outcompete correlative models in projecting spring phenology of trees in a future warmer climate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 285–286: 107931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107931

Basler, D., 2016. Evaluating phenological models for the prediction of leaf-out dates in six temperate tree species across central Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 217: 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.007

Basler, D., Körner, C., 2012. Photoperiod sensitivity of bud burst in 14 temperate forest tree species. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 165: 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.06.001

Blümel, K., Chmielewski, F.-M., 2012. Shortcomings of classical phenological forcing models and a way to overcome them. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 164: 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.001

Buonaiuto, D.M., Wolkovich, E.M., 2021. Differences be tween flower and leaf phenological responses to environmental variation drive shifts in spring phenological sequences of temperate woody plants. Journal of Ecology, 109: 2922–2933. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13708

Chuine, I., 2000. A unified model for budburst of trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 207(3): 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2178

Chuine, I., Kramer, K., Hänninen, H., 2003. Plant development models. In Schwartz, M.D.(eds). Phenology: an integrative environmental science. Tasks for Vegetation Science, 39. Dordrecht: Springer, p. 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0632-3_14

Fazilova, N.F., 2013. Fenologiya kashtana konskogo obyknovennogo (Aesculus hippocastanum) v Uzbekistane [Phenology of horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) in Uzbekistan]. Aktualnye Napravleniya Nauchnyh Issledovanij XXI Veka: Teoriya i Praktika, 4: 134–136. (In Russian).

Finn, G.A., Straszewski, A.E., Peterson, V., 2007. A general growth stage for describing trees and woody plants. Annals of Applied Biology, 151: 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00159.x

Flynn, D.F.B., Wolkovich, E.M., 2018. Temperature and photoperiod drive spring phenology across all species in a temperate forest community. New Phytologist, 219: 1353–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15232

Forsythe, W.C., Rykiel, E.J.Jr., Stahl, R.S., Wu, H.-I., Schoolfield, R.M., 1995. A model comparison for daylength as a function of latitude and day of year. Ecological Modelling, 80 (1): 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(94)00034-F

Fu, Y.H., Piao, S., Zhou, X., Geng, X., Hao, F., Vitasse, Y., Janssens, I.A., 2019. Short photoperiod reduces the temperature sensitivity of leaf-out in saplings of Fagus sylvatica but not in horse chestnut. Global Change Biology, 25: 1696–1703. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14599

Gauzere, J., Delzon, S., Davi, H., Bonhomme, M., de Cortazar-Atauri, I.G., Chuine, I., 2017. Integrating interactive effects of chilling and photoperiod in pheno-logical process-based models. A case study with two European tree species: Fagus sylvatica and Quercus petraea. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 244–245: 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.05.011

Gauzere, J., Lucas, C., Ronce, O., Davi, H., Chuine, I., 2019. Sensitivity analysis of tree phenology models reveals increasing sensitivity of their predictions to winter chilling temperature and photoperiod with warming climate. Ecological Modelling, 411: 108805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108805

Ge, Q., Wang, H., Rutishauser, T., Dai, J., 2015. Phenological response to climate change in China: a meta-analysis, Global Change Biology, 21: 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12648

Geng, X., Fu, Y.H., Piao, S., Hao, F., De Boeck, H.J., Zhang, X., Chen, S., Guo, Y., Prevéy, J.S., Vitasse, Y., Peñuelas, J., Janssens, I.A., Stenseth, N.Ch., 2022. Higher temperature sensitivity of flowering than leaf-out alters the time between phenophases across temperate tree species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31: 901–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13463

Hänninen, H., 1990. Modelling bud dormancy release in trees from cool and temperate regions. Acta Forestalia Fennica, 213: 1–47. https://doi.org/10.14214/aff.7660

Korsakova, S., Korzin, V., Plugatar, Y., Kazak, A., Gorina, V., Korzina, N., Khokhlov, S., Makoveichuk, K., 2023. Modelling of climate change’s impact on Prunus armeniaca L.’s flowering time. Inventions, 8: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions8030065

Korsakova, S.P., Korsakov, P.B., Bagrikova, N.A., 2020. Climatogenic changes and forecast of blooming timing of Juniperus deltoides (Cupressaceae). Science in the South of Russia, 16 (3): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.7868/S25000640200305

Korzh, D.A., Trikoz, N.N., 2022. Vliyanie abioticheskih faktorov na sezonnuyu dinamiku chislennosti Cameraria ohridella Deschka & Dimic v Nikitskom Botanicheskom Sadu [The influence of abiotic factors on the seasonal dynamics of the abundance of Cameraria ohridella Deschka & Dimic in the Nikitsky Botanical Gardens]. Biologiya Rastenij i Sadovodstvo: Teoriya, Innovacii, 3 (164): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.36305/2712-7788-2022-3-164-71-80 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.36305/2712-7788-2022-3-164-71-80

Kuranda, Yu.V., 2021. Semennaya reprodukciya Aesculus hippocastanum L. v kollekcii barnaulskogo dendrariya [Seed reproduction of Aesculus hippocastanum L. in the collection of the Barnaul arboretum]. Trudy po Introdukcii i Akklimatizacii Rastenij, 1: 583–588. (In Russian).

Lang, G., Early, J.D., Martin, G., Darnell. R., 1987. Endo-, para-, and ecodormancy: physiological terminology and classification for dormancy research. Hort Science, 22: 371–377. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.22.5.701b

Laube, J., Sparks, T.H., Estrella, N., Höfler, J., Ankerst, D.P., Menzel, A., 2014. Chilling outweighs photoperiod in preventing precocious spring development. Global Change Biology, 20 (1): 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12360

Malyshev, A.V., Henry, H.A.L., Bolte, A., Arfin Khan, M.A.S., Kreyling, J., 2018. Temporal photoperiod sensitivity and forcing requirements for budburst in temperate tree seedlings. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 248: 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.09.011

Meng, L., Zhou, Y., Gu, L., Richardson, A.D., Peñuelas, J., Fu, Y., Wang, Y., Asrar, G.R., De Boeck, H.J., Mao, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Zh., 2021. Photoperiod decelerates the advance of spring phenology of six deciduous tree species under climate warming, Global Change Biology, 27: 2914–2927. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15575

Migliavacca, M., Sonnentag, O., Keenan, T.F., Cescatti, A., O′Keefe, J., Richardson, A.D., 2012. On the uncertainty of phenological responses to climate change, and implications for a terrestrial biosphere model. Biogeo-sciences, 9: 2063–2083. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2063-2012

Minin, A.A., Ananin, A.A., Buyvolov, Yu.A., Larin, E.G., Lebedev, P.A., Polikarpova, N.V., Prokosheva, I.V., Rudenko, M.I., Sapelnikova, I.I., Fedotova, V.G., Shuyskaya, E.A., Yakovleva, M.V., Yantser, O.V., 2020. Rekomendacii po unifikacii fenologicheskih nablyudenij v Rossii [Recommendations to unify phenological observations in Russia]. Nature Conservation Research, 5 (4): 89–110. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2020.060. (In Russian).

Minin, A.A., Ran’kova, E.Ya., Ribina, E.G., Buyvolov, U.A., Sapel’nikova, I.I., Filatova, T.D., 2016. Fenoindikaciya izmenenij klimata za period 1976–2015 gg. v central’noj chasti Evropejskoj territorii Rossii [Phenoindication of current fluctuations in climate in the centre of the European part of Russia for the 1976–2015 years]. Problemy Ekologicheskogo Monitoringa i Modelirovaniya Ekosistem, 27 (2): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.21513/0207-2564-2016-2-17-28. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21513/0207-2564-2016-2-17-28

Mo, Y., Li, X., Guo, Y., Fu, Y., 2023. Warming increases the differences amongst spring phenology models under future climate change. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14: 1266801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1266801

Olsson, C., Olin, S., Lindström, J., Jönsso, A.M., 2017. Trends and uncertainties in budburst projections of Norway spruce in Northern Europe. Ecology and Evolution, 7: 9954–9969. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3476

Ovaskainen, O., Meyke, E., Lo, C., et al., 2020. Chronicles of nature calendar, a long-term and large-scale multitaxon database on phenology. Scientific Data, 7: 47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0376-z

Parmesan, C., 2007. Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Global Change Biology, 13(9): 1860–1872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01404.x

Polgar, C., Primack, R.B., 2011. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. New Phytologist, 191: 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03803.x

R Core Team, 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://cran.r-project.org/.

Richardson, A.D., Keenan, T.F., Migliavacca, M., Ryu, Y., Sonnentag, O., Toomey, M., 2013. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 169: 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012

Shvydenko, I.M., Bulat, A.G., Slyusarchuk, V.E., Nazarenko, V.V., Buhaiov, S.M., Cherkis, T.M., Stankevych, S.V., Zabrodina, I.V., Matsyura, A.V., 2021. Seasonal development of the chestnut leaf miner (Came-raria ohridella Deschka & Dimic, 1986) in the eastern forest-steppe of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 11 (2): 407–416. https://doi.org/10.15421/2021_130

Templ, B., Koch, E., Bolmgren, K., Ungersböck, M., Paul, A., Scheifinger, H., Rutishauser, Th., Busto, M., Chmielewski, F.-M., Hájková, L., Hodzić, S., Kaspar, F., Pietragalla, B., Romero-Fresneda, R., Tolvanen, A., Vučetič, V., Zimmermann, K., Zust, A., 2018. Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data. International Journal of Biometeorology, 62: 1109–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1512-8

Wang, S., Wu, Z., Gong, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, W., Zhang, Sh., De Boeck, H.J., Fu, Y.H., 2022. Climate warming shifts the time interval between flowering and leaf unfolding depending on the warming period. Science China Life Sciences, 65: 2316–2324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-022-2094-6

Wickham, H., 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.

Wolkovich, E.M., Cook, B.I., Allen, J.M., Crimmins, T.M., Betancourt, J.L., Travers, S.E., Pau, S., Regetz, J., Davies, T.J., Kraft, N.J., Ault, T.R., Bolmren, K., Mazer, S.J., McCabe, G.J., McGill, B.J., Parmesan, C., Salamin, N., Schwartz, M.D., Cleland, E.E., 2012. Warming experiments under predict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature, 485 (7399): 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11014

Zohner, C., Benito, B., Svenning, J-C., Renner, S.S., 2016. Day length unlikely to constrain climate-driven shifts in leaf-out times of northern woody plants. Nature Climate Change, 6: 1120–1123. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3138

Zohner, C.M., Renner, S.S., 2015. Perception of photoperi od in individual buds of mature trees regulates leaf-out. New Phytologist, 208: 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13510

Downloads

Published

2025-01-28

Issue

Section

Articles