Network structure of phytophagous insects associated with Theobroma bicolor (macambo) in an agroforestry system of the Peruvian Amazon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2025-0017Keywords:
biodiversity, connectance, ecological interactions, insect diversity, modularity, specializationsAbstract
Plant-insect interactions play a crucial role in shaping ecosystem structure and dynamics. In the present study, we describe the network structure of phytophagous insects associated with individual Theobroma bicolor in an agroforestry system of the Peruvian Amazon. Network analysis showed higher specialization and modularity than expected by null models, suggesting distinct insect assemblages with unique interactions. At the species level, Chrysomelidae sp. and Antiteuchus tripterus had higher degree and centrality, likely due to their greater mobility and ability to connect different segments of the network. Our findings highlight the high specialization in the phytophagous insect-Theobroma bicolor network. Understanding these interaction patterns can help identify key species and develop management strategies for biodiversity conservation in agroforestry systems.
References
Almeida-NETO, M., Ulrich, W., 2011. A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26: 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.08.003
Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F., Blüthgen, N., 2006. Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology, 6: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
Coral, G.A., Reyna, G.M.T., 2010. Manual de cultivo del Macambo Theobroma bicolor (Humb & Bonpl.) [Cultivation Manual of Macambo Theobroma bicolor (Humb. & Bonpl.)]. IIAP. Iquitos, Perú: Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana. 44 p. [cit. 2025-04-01]. http://www.iiap.org.pe/upload/publicacion/PUBL534.pdf. (In Spanish).
Dáttilo, W., Marquitti, F.M.D., Guimarães Jr, P.R., Izzo, T.J., 2014. The structure of ant–plant ecological networks: is abundance enough? Ecology, 95: 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1647.1
Deheuvels, O., De Waal, L., Bagny-Beilhe, L., 2017. How habitat heterogeneity affects pollinator's communities in cocoa-based agroforestry systems? In Proceedings of the first International Symposium on Cocoa Research ISCR 2017. Lima: ICCO. 5 p. [cit. 2025-04-01]. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/586664/
Delgado, C., Couturier, G., Balcazar, L., Chichipe, A., 2023. Insect pests of Theobroma cacao (Malvaceae) in the Peruvian Amazon. Tropical Agriculture, 100: 110–114.
Delmas, E., Besson, M., Brice, M.H., Burkle, L.A., Riva, G.V.D., Fortin, M.J., Gravel, D., Guimarães, P.R., Hembry, D.H., Newman, E.A., Olesen, J.M., Pires, M.M., Yeakel, J.D., Poisot, T., 2019. Analysing ecological networks of species interactions. Biological Reviews, 94: 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12433
Do, Y., Choi, M.B., 2019. Network analysis for co‐occur-rence of pest insects on host crops. Entomological Research, 49: 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12333
Dormann, C.F., Gruber, B., Fründ, J., 2008. Introducing the bipartite package: Analysing ecological networks. R News, 8: 8–11.
Dormann, C.F., Fründ, J., Blüthgen, N., Gruber, B., 2009. Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. The Open Journal of Ecology, 2: 7–24.
Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., Walker, B., Norberg, J., 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1: 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0488:RDECAR]2.0.CO;2
El-Wakeil, N.E., 2010. Insect economic levels in relation to crop production. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 43: 1710–1744. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400902753584
Fontaine, C., Guimarães JR, P.R., Kéfi, S., Loeuille, N., Memmott, J., Van Der Putten, W.H., Van Veen, F.JF., Thébault, E., 2011. The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. Ecology Letters, 14: 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01688.x
Fortuna, M.A., Stouffer, D.B., Olesen, J.M., Jordano, P., Mouillot, D., Krasnov, B.R., Poulin, R., Bascompte, J., 2010. Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? Journal of Animal Ecology, 79: 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01688.x
Grilli, J., Rogers, T., Allesina, S., 2016. Modularity and stability in ecological communities. Nature Communications, 7: 12031. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12031
Harterreiten-Souza, E.S., Togni, P.H.B., Pires, C.S.S., Sujii, E.R., 2014. The role of integrating agroforestry and vegetable planting in structuring communities of herbivorous insects and their natural enemies in the Neotropical region. Agroforestry Systems, 88: 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9666-1
Jankielsohn, A., 2018. The importance of insects in agricul- tural ecosystems. Advances in Entomology, 6: 62–73.
Jordano, P., 2016. Sampling networks of ecological interactions. Functional Ecology, 30: 1883–1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12763
Lagneaux, E., Andreotti, F., Neher, C.M., 2021. Cacao, copoazu and macambo: Exploring Theobroma diversity in smallholder agroforestry systems of the Peruvian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, 95: 1359–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00610-0
Lewinsohn, T.M., Prado, P.I., Jordano, P., Bascompte, J., Olesen, J.M., 2006. Structure in plant–animal interaction assemblages. Oikos, 113: 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14583.x
Marengo, J.A., 1998. Climatologia de la zona de Iquitos, Peru [Climatology of the Iquitos Region, Peru]. In Kalliola, R., Paintan, S.F., (eds). Geoecologia y desarrollo amazónico: estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos, Peru. Turku: Turun Yliopisto, p. 35–57. (In Spanish).
Melo, A.S., Paz-Neto, A. A., Melo, J.W.S., Gondim-Junior, M.G.C., 2024. Interspecific interaction network of mites associated with mango trees. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 93: 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-024-00936-1
Novotný, V., Basset, Y., 2000. Rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: pondering the mystery of singletons. Oikos, 89: 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890316.x
Olesen, J.M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y.L., Jordano, P.,2007. The modularity of pollination networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104: 19891–19896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706375104
Oliveira, J.B.B.S., Faria, M.L., Borges, M.A., Fagundes, M., Araújo, W.S., 2020. Comparing the plant–herbivore network topology of different insect guilds in Neotropical savannas. Ecological Entomology, 45: 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12808
Pinho, B.X., Dáttilo, W., Leal, I.R., 2017. Structural breakdown of specialized plant-herbivore interaction networks in tropical forest edges. Global Ecology and Conservation, 12: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.08.007
Power, A.G., 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365: 2959–2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
Shanker, C., Solanki, K.R., 2000. Agroforestry: an eco-friendly land-use system for insect management. Outlook on Agriculture, 29: 91–96. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000000101293
Tineo, D., Calderon, M.S., Maicelo, J.L., Oliva, M., Huamán-Pilco, Á.F., Ananco, O., Bustamante, D.E., 2024. Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the complete plastid genome of Theobroma bicolor (Malvaceae) from Peru. Mitochondrial DNA Part B, 9: 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2024.2310134
Torralba, M., Fagerholm, N., Burgess, P.J., Moreno, G., Plieninger, T., 2016. Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 230: 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.002
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A.M., Kruess, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Thies, C., 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 8: 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
Windsor, F.M., Armenteras, D., Assis, A.P.A., Astegiano, J., Santana, P.C., Cagnolo, L., Carvalheiro, L.G., Emary, C., Fort, H., Gonzalez, X.I., Kitson, J.J.N., Lacerda, A.C.F., Lois, M., Márquez-Velásquez, V., Miller, K.E., Monasterolo, M., Omacini, M., Maia, K.P., Palacios, T.P., Pocock, M.J.O., Poggio, S.L., Varassin, I.G., Vázquez, D.P., Tavella, J., Rother, D.C., Devoto, M., Guimarães, P.R., Evans, D.M., 2022. Network science: Applications for sustainable agroecosystems and food security. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 20: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2022.03.001
Zahra, S., Jorge, L., Dáttilo, W., Klimeš, P., Ferreira, P.D.L., Christianini, A., Nunes-Freitas, A.P., Laviski, B.F.S., Wang, B., Emer, C., Lara, C., Castillo-Guevara, C., Gomez, C., Corro, E., Lenc, J., Falcão, J., Tavella, J., Cagnolo, L., Pizo, M.A., Cuautle, M., Tahadlova, M., STAAB, M., Mottl, O., Miranda, N.P., Oliveira, P., Butterill, P.T., Antoniazzi, R., Xing, S., Izzo, T., Novotny, V., Fayle, T., 2024. Ant-plant specialisation depends on network type, but not disturbance, elevation, or latitude. Authorea, 6 May. [cit. 2025-04-01]. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.171500704.45910925/v1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights except for commercial rights (transfer of commercial rights) and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
