Non-target small mammal communities in invertebrate pitfall traps: effects of season, habitat, and elevation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2025-0020Keywords:
Eulipotyphla, live traps, method comparison, Rodentia, Slovakia, snap trapsAbstract
Despite considerable endeavours of scientists to avoid it, non-target species are frequently trapped for ecological and conservation research. Nevertheless, these data can provide valuable insights into how ecosystems function. Small mammals not targeted for epigeic fauna research were caught in pitfall traps over 20 years. At 186 sites between 2003 and 2023, 1,091 specimens of 21 species of insectivores and small rodents (Eulipotyphla, Rodentia) were caught in such traps. Our results show: (i) abundance of small mammals is affected by season, habitat, and elevation level; (ii) species richness of small mammals is affected by habitat and elevation levels and not by season. The efficiency of pitfall traps was compared with snap traps and live traps for sampling small mammals, where the results suggested significant differences in species richness only between pitfall and snap traps. The assemblage of small mammals found in pitfall traps was completely separated from that in live and snap traps. Capturing small mammals in pitfall traps is suitable for determining species richness for faunistic research in specific territories.
References
Adler, G.H., Lambert, T.D., 1997. Ecological correlates of trap response of a neotropical forest rodent Proechimys semispinosus. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 13 (1): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400010257
Ambros, M., 1998. Drobné cicavce (Insectivora, Rodentia) v zemných pasciach vybraných stanovíšť Bystričianskej doliny vo Vtáčniku [Small mammals (Insectivora, Rodentia) in pitfall traps at selected sites of the Bystričianska Valley in the Vtáčnik Mountains]. Rosalia (Nitra), 13: 235–240. (In Slovak).
Ambros, M., Gajdoš, P., 1988. Výskyt niektorých stavovcov v zemných pasciach (Amphibia, Reptilia, Mammalia) vo vzorkách získaných zemnými pascami na území Chránenej krajinnej oblasti Ponitrie [Occurrence of selected vertebrates in pitfall traps (Amphibia, Reptilia, Mammalia) from the Ponitrie Protected Landscape Area]. Rosalia (Nitra), 5: 177–188. (In Slovak).
Anděra, M., Horáček, I., 2005: Poznáváme naše savce [Getting to know our mammals]. Praha: Sobotáles. 327 p. (In Czech).
Animal Research Review Panel, 2020. Guideline 6: Use of pitfall traps. NSW Department of Primary Industries. [cit.2025-01-18]. https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/dpi/animals/animal-ethics-infolink/arrp-policies,-guidelines-andfactsheets/wildlife-research/pitfall-traps
Ardente, N.C., Ferreguetti, A.C., Gettinger, D., Leal, P., Martins-Hatano, F., Bergallo, H.G., 2017. Diferenças na eficiência entre dois métodos de amostragem para capturar pequenos mamíferos não-voadores em uma área na Amazônia oriental [Differential efficiency of two sampling methods in capturing non-volant small mammals in an area in eastern Amazonia]. Acta Amazonica, 47 (2): 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201602132. (In Spanish). https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201602132
Baláž, I., Jakab, I., 2010. Vplyv nadmorskej výšky na diver-zitu drobných cicavcov v podmienkach Slovenska [The effect of altitude on small mammal diversity in Slovakia]. Životné Prostredie, 44 (6): 329–333. (In Slovak).
Baláž, I., Ševčík, M., Tulis, F., Zigová, M., Dudich, A., 2021. Diversity, distribution and changes in communities of fleas on small mammals along the elevational gradient from the Pannonian Plain to the Carpathian Mountains. Parasitology, 148 (1): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182021000081
Boonstra, R., Krebs, C.J., 1978. Pitfall trapping of Microtus townsendii. Journal of Mammalogy, 59 (1): 136–148.
Bovendorp, R.S., McCleery, R.A., Galetti, M., 2017. Optimising sampling methods for small mammal communities in Neotropical rainforests. Mammal Review, 47: 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12088
Briese, L.A., Smith, M.H., 1974. Seasonal abundance and movement of nine species of small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 55 (3): 615–629. https://doi.org/10.2307/1379550
Brito, D., Fernandez, F.A.S., 2014. Eficiência da captura de pequenos mamíferos em uma paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atlântica: efeitos do tipo e posição das armadilhas, estação do ano e habitat [Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat]. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 74 (3): 518–524. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjb.2014.0075. (In Spanish). https://doi.org/10.1590/bjb.2014.0075
Caceres, N.C., Nápoli, R.P., Hannibal, W., 2010. Differential trapping success for small mammals using pitfall and standard cage traps in a woodland savannah region of southwestern Brazil. Mammalia, 75 (1): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2010.069
Carmignotto, A.P., Bezerra, A.M.R., Rodrigues, F.H.G., 2014. Nonvolant small mammals from a southwestern area of Brazilian Cerrado: diversity, habitat use, seasonality, and biogeography. Therya, 5 (2): 535–558. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-14-197.
Cogger, H., 2014. Reptiles and amphibians of Australia, 7th ed. Collingwood. CSIRO Publishing. 1036 p.
Csanády, A., Krišovský, P., Fedorčák, J., 2022. Príručka k metódam terénneho výskumu stavovcov [Handbook for field methods in vertebrate research]. Prešovská univerzita v Prešove. 223 p. (In Slovak).
Čanády, A., Mock, A., 2009. Drobné cicavce (Eulipotyphla, Rodentia) ako necieľové živočíchy v zemných pasciach na pôdne článkonožce na pokalamitných lokalitách vo vysokých Tatrách [Small mammals (Eulipotyphla, Rodentia) as non-target species in pitfall traps for soil arthropods at post-disturbance sites in the High Tatras]. In Natura Carpatica : zborník Východoslovenského múzea v Košiciach : prírodné vedy L. Košice : Východoslovenské múzeum, p. 165–170. (In Slovak).
Čepelka, L., Michalko, R., Kula, E., 2019. Efficiency of pitfall traps and snap traps in small terrestrial mammals depends on their diet composition. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 43 (3): 6. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1810-4
Dizney, L., Jones, P.D., Ruedas, L.A., 2008. Efficacy of three types of live traps used for surveying small mammals in the Pacific Northwest. Northwestern Naturalist, 89: 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1898/NWN08-18.1
Dudich, A., Kleinert, J., Štollmann, A., 1987. Výskyt drobných cicavcov vo vzorkách získaných zemnými lapákmi [Occurrence of small mammals in samples obtainedfrom pitfall traps]. Lynx (Praha), 23: 43–50. (In Slovak).
Dudich, A., Štollmann, A., 1985. Zemné lapáky a ich účinnosť z hľadiska výskumu fauny terrestrických mikromammálií [Pitfall traps and their effectiveness for research of terrestrial micromammal fauna]. Biológia (Bratislava), 40: 1049–1054. (In Slovak).
Figueiredo, V.V., da Cunha, N.L., de Morais, A.R., Terribile, L.C., Hannibal, W., 2021. The importance of sampling methods and landscape variation on explaining small mammal communities in a Neotropical ecotone region. Mammal Research, 66: 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00558-7
Futák, J., 1972. Fytogeografický prehľad Slovenska [Phyto-geographical overview of Slovakia]. In Lukniš, M. (ed.). Slovensko 2: Príroda. Bratislava: Obzor, p. 431–482. (In Slovak).
Gajdoš, P., 1986: Pavúky (Aranae) vybraných lokalít pohoria Tribeč [Spiders (Aranae) of selected sites in the Tribeč Mountains]. Rosalia (Nitra), 3: 135–150. (In Slovak).
Garey, M.V., Sturaro, M.J., Ferreira, G.S.V., da Silva, V.X., 2023. Eficiência de armadilhas pitfall na amostragem de pequenos vertebrados (Anura, Squamata e Mammalia) em fragmentos no sudeste da Floresta Atlântica, Brasil [Pitfall trap efficiency in sampling small vertebrates (Anura, Squamata, and Mammalia) in fragments of the Southeastern Atlantic Forest, Brazil]. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais, 18 (3): e2023-e893. DOI: 10.46357/bcnaturais.v18i3.893. (In Spanish). https://doi.org/10.46357/bcnaturais.v18i3.893.
Hammer, Ø., 1999–2021. PAST: PAleontological STatistics, Version 4.05. Reference manual. 284 p.
Hice, C., Schmidly, D., 2002. Diferenças na eficiência entre dois métodos de amostragem para capturar pequenos mamíferos não-voadores em uma área na Amazônia oriental [The effectiveness of pitfall traps for sampling small mammals in the Amazon Basin]. Mastozoología Neotropical, 9: 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201602132. (In Spanish). https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201602132
Kalko, E.K.V., Handley, C.O.J., 1993. Comparative studies of small mammal populations with transects of snap traps and pitfall arrays in southwest Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science, 44: 3–18.
Krebs, C.J., 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd ed. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings. 620 p.
Langraf, V., Petrovičová, K., Schlarmannová, J., Chovancová, Z., 2022. Changes in the community structure of epigeic arthropods in the conditions of ecological farming of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 82 (4): 527–536. DOI: 10.4067/ S0718-58392022000400527
Laurance, W.F., 1992. Abundance estimates of small mammals in Australian tropical rainforest: a comparison of four trapping methods. Wildlife Research, 19: 651–655. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR9920651
McClearn, D., Kohler, J., McGowan, K.J., Cedeno, E., Carbone, L.G., Miller, D., 1994. Arboreal and terrestrial mammal trapping on Gigante peninsula, Barro Colorado nature monument, Panama. Biotropica, 26: 208–213.
Mengak, M.T., Guynn, D.C.J., 1987. Pitfalls and snap traps for sampling small mammals and herpetofauna. American Midland Naturalist, 118: 28––288. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425786
Menkhorst, P.W., Knight, F., 2011. A field guide to the Mammals of Australia. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne. 296 p.
Mošanský, L., Stanko, M., 2001. Príspevok k poznaniu fauny stavovcov (Amphibia, Aves, Mammalia) dolného toku Bodrogu (Kováčske lúky, Východoslovenská rovina) [Contribution to the knowledge of vertebrate fauna (Amphibia, Aves, Mammalia) of the lower Bodrog River area (Kováčske lúky, Eastern Slovak Lowland)]. In Natura Carpatica: zborník Východoslovenského múzea. 42. Košice: Východoslovenské múzeum, p. 145–154. (In Slovak).
Mošanský, L., Stanko, M., Fričová, J., 2000. Doterajšie poznatky z využitia zemných pascí pri teriologických výskumoch na východnom Slovensku [Current knowledge of the use of pitfall traps in mammal studies in Eastern Slovakia]. Lynx (Praha), 31: 69–79. (In Slovak).
Mulungu, L.S., Makundi, R.H., Massawe, A.W., Machangu, R.S., Mbije, N.E., 2008. Diversity and distribution of rodent and shrew species associated with variations in altitude on Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Mammalia, 72: 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1515/MAMM.2008.021
Nicolas, V., Colyn, M., 2006. Relative efficiency of three types of small mammal traps in an African rainforest. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 136: 107–111.
Palmeirim, A.F., Benchimol, M., Vieira, M.V., Peres C.A., 2018. Small mammal responses to Amazonian forest islands are modulated by their forest dependence. Oecologia, 187: 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4114-6
Pankakoski, E., 1979. The cone trap –a useful tool for index trapping of small mammals. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 16: 144–150.
Pearce, J.L., Schuurman, D., Barber, K.N., Larrivée, M., Venier, L.A., McKee, J., McKenney, D., 2005. Pitfall trap designs to maximize invertebrate captures and minimize captures of nontarget vertebrates. Canadian Entomologist, 137: 233–250. https://doi.org/10.4039/N04-029
Pelikán, J., Zejda, J., Holišová, V., 1977. Efficiency of different traps in catching small mammals. Folia Zoologica, 26 (1): 1–13.
Powell, R.A., Proulx, G., 2003. Trapping and marking terrestrial mammals for research: integrating ethics, performance criteria, techniques, and common sense. Ilar Journal, 44 (4): 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.44.4.259
Pucek, Z., 1969. Trap response and estimation of numbers of shrews in removal catches. Acta Theriologica, 14: 403–426.
Pucek, Z., Jedrzejewski, W., Jedrzejewska, B., Pucek, M., 1993. Rodent population dynamics in a primeval deciduous forest (Bialowieza National Park) in relation to weather, seed crop, and predation. Acta Theriologica, 38: 199–232.
Ribeiro-Júnior, M.A., Rossi, R.V., Miranda, C.L., Ávila-Pires, T.C., 2011. Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest. Zoologia (Curitiba), 28: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702011000100012
Santos-Filho, M.D., Lázari, P.R.D., Sousa, C.P.F.D., Canale, G.R., 2015. Avaliação da eficiência de armadilhas para pequenos mamíferos no sul da Amazônia [Trap efficiency evaluation for small mammals in the southern Amazon]. Acta Amazonica, 45: 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201401953. (In Spanish). https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201401953
Santos-Filho, M., Silva, D.J., Sanaiotti, T.M., 2006. Efficiency of four trap types in sampling small mammals in forest fragments, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Mastozoología Neotropical, 13 (2): 217–225.
Sikes, R.S., Gannon, W.L., 2011. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy, 92, 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-F-355.1
Stanko, M., 2014. Metódy ekologického výskumu drobných cicavcov [Ecological research methods for small mammals]. Košice: Parazitologický ústav SAV. 25 p. ISBN 978-80-971331-5-3. (In Slovak).
Stanko, M., Mošanský, L., Fričová, J., Casanova, J.C., 1999. Comparison of two sampling methods of small mammals in the margins of a lowland forest. Biologia, Bratislava, 54 (5): 595–597.
Stanová, V., Valachovič, M., 2002. Katalóg biotopov Slovenska [Habitat Catalogue of Slovakia] . Bratislava: DAPHNE 225 p. (In Slovak).
Sheftel, B.I., 2018. Methods for estimating the abundance of small mammals. Russian Journal of Ecosystem Ecology, 3: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21685/2500-0578-2018-3-4
Stephens, R.B., Anderson, E.M., 2014. Effects of trap type on small mammal richness, diversity, and mortality. Wild-life Society Bulletin, 38: 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.418
Stromgren, E.J., Sullivan, T.P., 2014. Influence of pitfall versus Longworth livetraps, bait addition, and drift fences on trap success and mortality of shrews. Acta Theriologica, 59: 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-013-0149-6
Thompson, S.A., Thompson, G.G., 2008. Vertebrate by-catch in invertebrate wet pitfall traps. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 91: 237–241.
Tischler, W., 1949. Grundzüge der terrestrischen Tierökologie [Fundamentals of terrestrial animal ecology]. Springer. 220 p.
Umetsu, F., Naxara, L., Pardini, R., 2006. Evaluating the efficiency of pitfall traps for sampling small mammals in the neotropics. Journal of Mammalogy, 87: 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-285R2.1
Vieira, A.L.M., Pires, A.S., Nunes-Freitas, A.F., Oliveira, N.M., Resende, A.S., Campello, E.F.C., 2014. Eficiência da captura de pequenos mamíferos em uma paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atlântica: efeitos do tipo e posição das armadilhas, estação do ano e habitat [Efficiency of small mammal trapping in an Atlantic Forest fragmented landscape: the effects of trap type and position, seasonality and habitat]. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 74 (3): 538–544. (In Spanish).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights except for commercial rights (transfer of commercial rights) and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
