Predicting forest biodiversity from spaceborne GEDI LiDAR and machine learning: structural drivers and regional transferability across Pacific Northwest forests
Keywords:
canopy structure, forest biodiversity, GEDI LiDAR, spatial transferability, species richnessAbstract
Remote sensing offers important opportunities for large-scale biodiversity monitoring, yet the capacity of spaceborne laser scanning to predict forest biodiversity remains insufficiently understood. This study evaluates relationships between forest structural complexity and tree species diversity using data from the GEDI mission. Structural metrics describing canopy height, vegetation density and vertical foliage distribution were linked to ground-based forest inventory data from 9,692 plots across the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. Tree biodiversity was quantified using species richness and two diversity indices. Structural complexity showed consistent positive relationships with biodiversity, with vegetation density and vertical foliage heterogeneity outperforming maximum canopy height as predictors. Machine-learning models explained approximately 17–22% of biodiversity variation under standard cross-validation. In contrast, spatial cross-validation revealed strong reductions in predictive performance, indicating limited geographic transferability. Including broad-scale climate variables produced modest improvements, while regionally calibrated models substantially increased accuracy, achieving up to 40% explained variance for species richness. Overall, the results demonstrate that spaceborne laser-derived forest structure contains meaningful biodiversity information, but effective large-area application requires regional calibration to account for spatial variation in forest composition and environmental conditions.
References
Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O., Lengauer, T.,
2010. Permutation importance: a corrected feature
importance measure. Bioinformatics, 26 (10): 1340–
1347. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134
Atkins, J.W., Costanza, J., Dahlin, K.M., Dannenberg,
M.P., Elmore, A.J., Fitzpatrick, M.C., Hakken-
berg, C.R., Hardiman, B.S., Kamoske, A., LaRue,
E.A., Silva, C.A., Stovall, A.E.L., Tielens, E.K.,
2023. Scale dependency of lidar-derived forest struc-
tural diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 14
(2): 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14040
Bechtold, W.A., Patterson, P.L., 2005. The enhanced
Forest Inventory and Analysis program — national
sampling design and estimation procedures. General
Technical Report SRS-80. Asheville, NC: U.S. De-
partment of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Re-
search Station. 85 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-
GTR-80
Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning,
45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Burns, P., Hakkenberg, C.R., Goetz, S.J., 2024. Multi-
resolution gridded maps of vegetation structure from
GEDI. Scientific Data, 11: 881. https://doi.org/10.
1038/s41597-024-03668-4
Chao, A., Chiu, C.-H., Jost, L., 2014. Unifying species
diversity, phylogenetic diversity, functional diver-
sity, and related similarity and differentiation mea-
sures. Ecological Monographs, 84 (1): 45–67. https://
doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091540
Coulston, J.W., Reams, G.A., 2004. The effect of blurred
plot coordinates on interpolating forest biomass.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36 (5): 801–
807. https://doi.org/10.1139/X05-265
de Conto, T., Armston, J., Dubayah, R., 2024. Charac-
terizing the structural complexity of the Earth's forests
with spaceborne lidar. Nature Communications, 15:
8116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52468-2
Dhargay, S., Lyell, C.S., Brown, T.P., Inbar, A., Sheri-
dan, G.J., Lane, P.N.J., 2022. Performance of GEDI
space-borne LiDAR for quantifying structural varia-
tion in the temperate forests of south-eastern Austra-
lia. Remote Sensing, 14 (15): 3615. https://doi.org/
10.3390/rs14153615
Dhargay, S., Lyell, C.S., Brown, T.P., Inbar, A., Sheri-
dan, G.J., Lane, P.N.J., 2020. The Global Ecosystem
Dynamics Investigation: high-resolution laser ranging
of the Earth's forests and topography. Science of Re-
mote Sensing, 1: 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.
2020.100002
Duncanson, L.I., Armston, J., Kellner, J.R., Dubayah,
R., 2022 Aboveground biomass density models for
NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation
(GEDI) lidar mission. Remote Sensing of Environ-
ment, 270: 112845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.
112845
FAO, UNEP, 2020. The State of the World's Forests 2020:
Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome: FAO. 188 p.
https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en
Friedman, J.H., 2001. Greedy function approximation:
a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29
(5): 1189–1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451
Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko,
S., Thau, D., Moore, R., 2017. Google Earth Engi-
ne: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone.
Remote Sensing of Environment, 202: 18–27. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
Hancock, S., Armston, J., Hofton, M., Sun, X., Tang,
H., Duncanson, L.I., Kellner, J.R., Dubayah, R.,
2019. The GEDI simulator: a large-footprint wave
form lidar simulator for calibration and validation
of spaceborne missions. Earth and Space Science, 6
(2): 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000506
Hernández-Stefanoni, J.L., Dupuy, J.M., Johnson, K.D.,
Birdsey, R., Tun-Dzul, F., Peduzzi, A., Caamal-Sosa,
J.P., Sánchez-Santos, G., López-Merlín, D., 2014.
Improving species diversity and biomass estimates of
tropical dry forests using airborne LiDAR. Remote
Sensing, 6 (6): 4741–4763. https://doi.org/10.3390/
rs6064741
Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G.,
Jarvis, A., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated
climate surfaces for global land areas. International
Journal of Climatology, 25 (15): 1965–1978. https://
doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
Hoerl, A.E., Kennard, R.W., 1970. Ridge regression:
biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Techno-
metrics, 12 (1): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401
706.1970.10488634
Kamoske, A.G., Dahlin, K.M., Read, Q.D., Record, S.,
Stark, S.C., Serbin, S.P., Zarnetske, P.L., Dorne-
las, M., 2022. Towards mapping biodiversity from
above: can fusing lidar and hyperspectral remote
sensing predict taxonomic, functional, and phylo-
genetic tree diversity in temperate forests? Global
Ecology and Biogeography, 31 (7): 1440–1460. https:
//doi.org/10.1111/geb.13516
Leutner, B.F., Reineking, B., Müller, J., Bachmann,
M., Beierkuhnlein, C., Dech, S., Wegmann, M.,
2012. Modelling forest α-diversity and floristic com-
position – on the added value of LiDAR plus hyper-
Spectral remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 4 (9): 2818–
2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4092818
MacArthur, R.H., MacArthur, J.W., 1961. On bird
species diversity. Ecology, 42 (3): 594–598. https://
doi.org/10.2307/1932254
Magurran, A.E., 2004. Measuring biological diversity.
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 256 p.
Mandl, L., Stritih, A., Seidl, R., Ginzler, C., Senf, C.,
2023. Spaceborne LiDAR for characterizing forest
structure across scales in the European Alps. Remote
Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 9 (5): 599–614.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.330
226
Moeslund, J.E., Zlinszky, A., Ejrnæs, R., Brunbjerg,
A.K., Bøcher, P.K., Svenning, J.-C., Normand, S.,
2019. Light detection and ranging explains diversity
of plants, fungi, lichens, and bryophytes across multiple
habitats and large geographic extent. Ecological App-
lications, 29 (5): e01907. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.
1907
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel,
V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Pret-
tenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas,
J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Per-
rot, M., Duchesnay, E., 2011. Scikit-learn: machine
learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Re-
search, 12: 2825–2830. https://doi.org/10.5555/
1953048.2078195
Roberts, D.R., Bahn, V., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M.S., Elith, J.,
Guillera-Arroita, G., Hauenstein, S., Lahoz-Mo-
nfort, J.J., Schröder, B., Thuiller, W., Warton,
D.I., Wintle, B.A., Hartig, F., Dormann, C.F.,
2017. Cross-validation strategies for data with tem-
poral, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic struc-
ture. Ecography, 40 (8): 913–929. https://doi.org/
10.1111/ecog.02881
Schneider, F.D., Morsdorf, F., Schmid, B., Petchey, O.
L., Hueni, A., Schimel, D.S., Schaepman, M.E.,
2017. Mapping functional diversity from remotely
sensed morphological and physiological forest traits.
Nature Communications, 8: 1441. https://doi.org/10.
1038/s41467-017-01530-3
Simonson, W.D., Allen, H.D., Coomes, D.A., 2014. Ap-
plications of airborne lidar for the assessment of ani-
mal species diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evo-
lution, 5 (8): 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-
210X.12219
Stanke, H., Finley, A.O., Weed, A.S., Walters, B.F., Dom-
ke, G.M., 2020. rFIA: an R package for estimation
of forest attributes with the US Forest Inventory and
Analysis database. Environmental Modelling &
Software, 127: 104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.env
soft.2020.104664
Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wich-
mann, M.C., Schwager, M., Jeltsch, F., 2004. Ani-
mal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/
diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Jour-
nal of Biogeography, 31 (1): 79–92. https://doi.org/
10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x
Toivonen, J., Kangas, A., Maltamo, M., Kukkonen, M.,
Packalen, P., 2023. Assessing biodiversity using forest
structure indicators based on airborne laser scanning
data. Forest Ecology and Management, 546: 121376.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121376
Torresani, M., Rocchini, D., Sonnenschein, R., Ze-
bisch, M., Hauffe, H.C., Heym, M., Pretzsch, H.,
Tonon, G., 2023. LiDAR GEDI derived tree cano-
py height heterogeneity reveals patterns of biodi-
versity in forest ecosystems. Ecological Informatics,
73: 102082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102082
UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, 2020. Protected Planet Report 2020.
Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland: UNEP-WCMC
and IUCN. https://doi.org/10.34892/jg6t-xn70
USDA Forest Service, 2022. Forest Inventory and Analy-
sis National Core Field Guide. https://doi.org/10.2737/
FIA-FG-2022
Woudenberg, S.W., Conkling, B.L., O'Connell, B.M.,
LaPoint, E.B., Turner, J.A., Waddell, K.L., 2010.
The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: data-
base description and users manual version 4.0 for
Phase 2. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-245.
Fort Collins, CO: U.S, Department of Agricuture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shah Satyam (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights except for commercial rights (transfer of commercial rights) and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
