Tree cover, understory complexity and heaps shape fine-scale microhabitat partitioning in sympatric rodents
Keywords:
Apodemus spp., Clethrionomys glareolus, heap structures, Mediterranean forest ecology, microhabitat heterogeneity, niche partitioning, Vipera aspisAbstract
Habitat heterogeneity promotes species coexistence by increasing opportunities for niche differentiation. Temperate forest small mammals provide an excellent model for investigating how fine-scale habitat structure influences spatial segregation. In this study, we examined fine-scale microhabitat associations of sympatric forest rodents, Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus spp., within a heterogeneous deciduous woodland in central Italy. We reanalysed a historical dataset using contemporary statistical approaches to assess habitat associations, based on a 289-trap grid (2-m spacing, 12 days) and 20 additional traps monitored for 23 days in woody debris heaps and control plots. A total of 176 individuals of Apodemus spp. and 65 of C. glareolus were captured within the trapping grid, whereas C. glareolus was recorded near heaps significantly more frequently (49.1%, n = 57 captures) than Apodemus spp. (32.8%, n = 116). Multivariate ordination (RDA), GLMMs and GLMs consistently identified vegetation structural complexity as the main driver of habitat segregation. Clethrionomys glareolus was associated with woody debris heaps and higher tree cover, whereas Apodemus spp. preferred herb-rich, open understory habitats and occurred significantly less frequently near heaps. Independent evidence from the spatial distribution of the asp viper (Vipera aspis), the principal ambush predator of both rodents, further indicated that heaps function as focal microhabitats, with nearly 90% of recently fed vipers recorded within 5 m of these structures. These results support the hypothesis that fine-scale habitat heterogeneity promotes coexistence by reducing spatial niche overlap. Maintaining structural complexity, including woody debris and heterogeneous understory layers, may therefore contribute to sustaining small mammal diversity in Mediterranean forest ecosystems.
References
Amarasekare, P., 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatia-
lly structured environments: a synthesis. Ecology Letters,
6 (12): 1109–1122. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.
2003.00530.x
Amarasekare, P., 2008. Spatial dynamics of foodwebs.
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics,
39 (1): 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.
39.110707.173434
Amori, G., Castigliani, V., Locasciulli, O., Luiselli, L.,
2015. Long-term density fluctuations and microhabitat
use of sympatric Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes gla-
reolus in central Italy. Community Ecology, 16 (2): 196–
238
205. https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2015.16.2.7
Amori, G., Cristaldi, M., Fanfani, A., Solida, L., Luiselli,
L., 2010. Ecological coexistence of low-density popu-
lations of Apodemus sylvaticus and A. flavicollis (Mam-
malia: Rodentia). Rendiconti Lincei, 21: 171–182. https:
//doi.org/10.1007/s12210-010-0076-2
Amori, G., Panno, E., Cristaldi, M., 1986. Preliminary ob-
servation on the nesting pattern of wild rodents' in the
Macchia della Manziana (Rome, Italy). Bollettino di Zoo-
logia, 53 (4): 369–372.
Ancillotto, L., Viviano, A., Mori, E., Bani, L., Orioli, V.,
Tirozzi, P., Valletti, G., Dondina, O., 2025. Micro-
habitat features shape small mammal urban assemblages
across Italian cities. Science of the Total Environment,
988: 179826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.
179826
Andrzejewski, R.; Olszewski, J., 1963. Social behaviour
and interspecific relations in Apodemus flavicollis (Melchior,
1834) and Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780).
Acta Theriologica, 10: 155–168.
Angeli, P., Corsanici, S., Pilia, L., 2025. Amanita lepiotoides,
specie interessante raccolta nella cerreta di Manziana
(Roma) [Amanita lepiotoides, an interesting species
collected in the Turkey oak forest of Manziana (Rome)].
Micologia nelle Marche, IX (1) NS: 49–53. (In Italian).
Balčiauskas, L., Balčiauskienė, L., 2026. Microrefugia for
small mammals in European forests. Forests, 17 (4): 398.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040398
Balestrieri, A., Remonti, L., Morotti, L., Saino, N., Pri-
gioni, C., Guidali, F., 2017. Multilevel habitat preferen-
ces of Apodemus sylvaticus and Clethrionomys glareo-
lus in an intensively cultivated agricultural landscape.
Ethology, Ecology, and Evolution, 29 (1): 38–53.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Jagan,
M., Ly, A., 2003. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models
using ‘Eigen’ and S4. CRAN: Contributed Packages,
The R Foundation. http://dx.doi.org/10.32614/cran.
package.lme4
Benedek, A.M., Alecsa, M.A., Botoran, O.R., Costinel,
D., Postolache, C., 2026. Evidence for niche theory in
small mammals along an elevational gradient as revealed
by isotopic signatures. Journal of Vertebrate Biology,
75: 25100. https://doi.org/10.25225/jvb.25100
Benedek, A.M., Sîrbu, I., 2025. Habitat selection patterns
suggest competition between two forest rodent species
along an elevational gradient. Ecology and Evolution,
15 (6): e71490. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71490
Benedek, A.M., Sîrbu, I., Lazăr, A., 2021. Responses of
small mammals to habitat characteristics in Southern
Carpathian forests. Scientific Reports, 11 (1): 12031.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91488-6
Blondel, J., 2010. The Mediterranean region: biological
diversity in space and time. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Uni-
versity Press.
Boeye, J., Kubisch, A., Bonte, D., 2014. Habitat structure
mediates spatial segregation and therefore coexistence.
Landscape Ecology, 29 (4): 593–604. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s10980-014-0010-6
Brown, J. S., 1989. Desert rodent community structure: a test
of four mechanisms of coexistence. Ecological Mono-
graphs, 59 (1): 1–20.
Bull, E.L., 2002. The value of coarse woody debris to verte-
brates in the Pacific Northwest. In Proceedings of the
Symposium on the Ecology and Management of Dead
Wood in Western Forests. Reno, Nevada, November 2-4,
1999. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-181. Alba-
ny, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Ser-
vice, US Department of Agriculture, p. 171–178.
Camargo, N.F.D., Sano, N.Y., Vieira, E.M., 2018. Forest
vertical complexity affects alpha and beta diversity of
small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 99 (6): 1444–
1454. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy136
Cannon, J.B., Tinkham, W.T., DeAngelis, R.K., Hill, E.M.,
Battaglia, M.A., 2019. Variability in mixed conifer
spatial structure changes understory light environments.
Forests, 10 (11): 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10111015
Capizzi, D., Capula, M., Rugiero, L., Luiselli, L., 2008.
Dietary patterns of two sympatric Mediterranean snakes
(Hierophis viridiflavus and Zamenis longissimus) along
a gradient of habitat alteration. The Herpetological
Journal, 18 (3): 141–146.
Capula, M., Luiselli, L., 1990. Analysis of the gut contents
of Vipera aspis (Reptilia, Viperidae) from an area of
Central Italy (Tolfa Mountains, Latium): a new method
to study the terrestrial small mammals (in Italian). Hys-
trix, 2 (1): 101–107.
Carey, A.B., Wilson, S.M., 2001. Induced spatial heteroge-
neity in forest canopies: responses of small mammals.
Journal of Wildlife Management, 65: 1014–1027.
Casula, P., Luiselli, L., Amori, G., 2019. Which population
density affects home ranges of co-occurring rodents? Ba-
sic and Applied Ecology, 34: 46–54. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.baae.2018.11.002
Chesson, P., 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species
diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,
31 (1): 343–366.
Chock, R.Y., Shier, D.M., Grether, G.F., 2022. Niche par-
titioning in an assemblage of granivorous rodents, and
the challenge of community-level conservation. Oeco-
logia, 198 (2): 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-
021-05104-5
Corsanici, S., Angeli, P., 2023. Primo ritrovamento in Italia
di Donkia pulcherrima, una specie di incerta collocazi
one sistematica [First record of Donkia pulcherrima in
Italy, a species of uncertain systematic position]. Mico-
logia nelle Marche, 7: 27–34. (In Italian).
Denny, C.K., Nielsen, S.E., 2017. Spatial heterogeneity
of the forest canopy scales with the heterogeneity of an
understory shrub based on fractal analysis. Forests, 8 (5):
146. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8050146
Ernest, S.M., Brown, J.H., Thibault, K.M., White, E.P.,
Goheen, J.R., 2008. Zero sum, the niche, and metacom-
munities: long-term dynamics of community assembly.
American Naturalist, 172 (6): E257–E269.
Ferrari, G., Devineau, O., Tagliapietra, V., Johnsen, K.,
Ossi, F., Cagnacci, F., 2025. Effect of resource abun-
dance on woodland rodents’ demography at latitudinal
extremes in Europe. Ecology and Evolution, 15 (6):
e71466. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71466
Flowerdew, J.R., Gurnell, J., Gipps, J.H.W., 1985. The
ecology of woodland rodents: bank voles and wood mice.
Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Gámez, S., Harris, N.C., 2022. Conceptualizing the 3D niche
and vertical space use. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,
37 (11): 953–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.
06.012
Grüm, L., Bujalska, G., 2000. Bank voles and yellow-necked
mice: what are interrelations between them? Polish
239
Journal of Ecology, 48: 141–145.
Gurnell, J., 1985. Woodland rodents communities. Sympo-
sia of the Zoological Society of London, 55: 377–411.
Hill, M.O., 1979. DECORANA: A Fortran program for de-
trended correspondence analysis and reciprocal avera-
ging. Ithaca, U.S.A.: Cornell University Press.
Harmon, M.E., Franklin, J.F., Swanson, F.J., Sollins, P.,
Gregory, S.V., Lattin, J. D., ..., Cummins, K., 1986.
Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosys-
tems. Advances in Ecological Research, 15: 133–302.
Holt, R.D., 1984. Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions,
and the coexistence of prey species. American Naturalist,
124 (3): 377–406.
Ishii, H.T., Tanabe, S.I., Hiura, T., 2004. Exploring the re-
lationships among canopy structure, stand productivity,
and biodiversity of temperate forest ecosystems. Forest
Science, 50 (3): 342–55.
Jedrzejewski,W., Rychlik, L., Jedrzejewska, B., 1993. Res-
ponses of bank voles to odours of seven species of preda-
tors: experimental data and their relevance to natural
predator-vole relationships. Oikos, 68: 251–257.
Jensen, T.S., 1985. Seed-seed predator interactions of Euro-
pean beech, Fagus silvatica and forest rodents, Clethrio-
nomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis. Oikos, 1985:
149–156.
Kajita, R., Kajimura, H., 2024. Wood mice utilize under-
story vegetation of leafless dead Dwarf bamboo culms
as a habitat and foraging site. Diversity, 16 (8): 458. https:
//doi.org/10.3390/d16080458
Lassau, S.A., Hochuli, D.F., Cassis, G., Reid, C.A., 2005.
Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity:
do functional groups respond consistently? Diversity
and Distributions, 11 (1): 73–82.
Leimgruber, P., McShea, W.J., Songer, M., 2014. Vertical
habitat segregation as a mechanism for coexistence in
sympatric rodents. Mammalian Biology, 79 (5): 313–
317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.04.002
Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F., 2013. Conserving fo-
rest biodiversity:a comprehensive multiscaled appro-
ach. New York, U.S.A.: Island press.
Liu, X., Feng, Y., Hu, T., Luo, Y., Zhao, X., Wu, J., ..., Su, Y.,
2024. Enhancing ecosystem productivity and stability
with increasing canopy structural complexity in global
forests. Science Advances, 10 (20): eadl1947. https://doi.
org/10.1126/sciadv.adl1947
Luiselli, L.M., Agrimi, U., 1991. Composition and variation
of the diet of Vipera aspis francisciredi in relation to age
and reproductive stage. Amphibia-Reptilia, 12 (2): 137–144.
Mazurkiewicz, M., Rajska-Jurgiel, E., 1998. Spatial be-
haviour and population dynamics of woodland rodents.
Acta Theriologica, 43 (2): 137–161.
McElhinny, C., Gibbons, P., Brack, C., Bauhus, J., 2005.
Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its defi-
nition and measurement. Forest Ecology and Manage-
ment, 218 (1-3): 1–24.
McPeek, M.A., 1996. Trade-offs, food web structure, and the
coexistence of habitat specialists and generalists. Ameri-
can Naturalist, 148: S124–S138.
Mitchell-Jones, A.J., Amori, G., Kryštufek, B., Marnell,
F., Miteva, S., Sallay, A., Schley, L., Thissen, J., Voh-
ralík, V., 2026. The atlas of European mammals. 2nd
edition. London, U.K.: CRC Press.
Montgomery, W.I., 1978. Microhabitat separation and popu-
lation regulation in woodland rodents. Journal of Animal
Ecology, 47 (2): 593–607.
Montgomery, W.I., 1980. Population structure and dynamics
of sympatric Apodemus species (Rodentia: Muridae).
Journal of Zoology, 192 (3): 351–377.
Murphy, B.A., May, J.A., Butterworth, B.J., Andresen,
C.G., Desai, A.R., 2022. Unraveling forest complexity:
resource use efficiency, disturbance, and the structure-
function relationship. Journal of Geophysical Research:
Biogeosciences, 127 (6): e2021JG006748. https://doi.org/
10.1029/2021jg006748
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Le-
gendre, P., McGlinn, D., ... Wagner, H., 2016. Vegan:
Community Ecology Package. Ordination methods, di-
versity analysis and other functions for community and
vegetation ecologists. Version 2.3-5. Berkeley, CA, USA:
The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).
Owen, R.D., Camp, J.V., Sage, R., Rodríguez, L., Martínez
Bruyn, V. J., McAllister, R.C., Jonsson, C.B., 2020.
Sympatry and habitat associations of sigmodontine ro-
dents in a neotropical forest-savanna interface. Mamma-
lia, 84 (3): 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-
2019-0036
Pucek, Z., Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska, B., Pucek, M.,
1993. Rodent population dynamics in a primeval deci-
duous forest (Białewieza National Park) in relation to
weather, seed crop, and predation. Acta Theriologica,
38: 199–232.
Radu, S., 2006. The ecological role of deadwood in natural
forests. In Nature conservation: concepts and practice.
Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, p. 137–141.
Reyes-Puig, C., Enriquez-Urzelai, U., Sillero, N., Ka-
liontzopoulou, A., 2025. Niche differences in co-
existing species: ecological insights into the role of activi-
ty patterns, space use, and environmental preferences.
Ecology and Evolution, 15 (8): e71802. https://doi.org/
10.1002/ece3.71802
Ricklefs, R.E., Relyea, R., Richter, C., 2014. Ecology: the
economy of nature. Vol. 1. 7th edition. New York, U.S.A.:
WH Freeman.
Rocha, C.R., Ribeiro, R., Marinho-Filho, 2017. Influence of
temporal variation and seasonality on population dyna-
mics of three sympatric rodents. Mammalian Biology,
84 (1): 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.01.001
Růžičková, J., Kovács, B., Németh, C., Ódor, P., Elek, Z.,
2026. Humidity and gap history drive predation pre-
ssure on large carabids in a managed temperate forest.
Global Ecology and Conservation, 2026: e04153. https:
//doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04153
Seibold, S., Bässler, C., Brandl, R., Gossner, M.M., Thorn,
S., Ulyshen, M.D., Müller, J., 2015. Experimental
studies of dead-wood biodiversity—a review identifying
global gaps in knowledge. Biological Conservation, 191:
139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.006
Shaw, D.C., 2004. Vertical organization of canopy biota. Forest
Canopies, 73: 101.
Sozio, G., Mortelliti, A., 2016. Empirical evaluation of the
strength of interspecific competition in shaping small
mammal communities in fragmented landscapes. Land-
scape Ecology, 31: 775–789.
Spada, F., 1977. Primi lineamenti della vegetazione del com-
prensorio Tolfetano-Cerite-Manziate [Preliminary out-
lines of the vegetation of the Tolfetano–Cerite–Manziate
area]. Quaderni dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei,
227: 37–49. (In Italian).
240
Stevens, R.D., Tello, J.S., 2011. Diversity begets diversity:
relative roles of structural and resource heterogeneity
in determining rodent community structure. Journal of
Mammalogy, 92 (2): 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1644/
10-mamm-a-117.1
Suchomel, J., Purchart, L., Čepelka, L., Heroldová, M.,
2014. Structure and diversity of small mammal commu-
nities of mountain forests in Western Carpathians. Eu-
ropean Journal of Forest Research, 133 (3): 481–490.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-013-0778-y
Swan, M., Christie, F., Steel, E., Sitters, H., York, A., Di
Stefano, J., 2020. Ground-dwelling mammal diversity
responds positively to productivity and habitat hetero-
geneity in a fire-prone region. Ecosphere, 11 (9): e03248.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3248
Thomas, S.M., Soka, G.E., Mulungu, L.S., 2022. Influence
of vegetation structure, seasonality, and soil properties
on rodent diversity and community assemblages in west
Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Ecology and Evolution, 12
(9): e9211. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.163842979.99861775/
v1
Van Allen, B.G., Rudolf, V.H., 2015. Habitat-mediated carry-
over effects lead to context-dependent outcomes of spe-
cies interactions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84 (6):
1646–1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12408
Wardhaugh, C.W., 2014. The spatial and temporal distribu-
tions of arthropods in forest canopies: uniting disparate
patterns with hypotheses for specialisation. Biological
Reviews, 89 (4): 1021–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/
brv.12094
Ylönen, H, Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., Heikkila,
J., 1992. Antipredatory behavior of Clethronomys voles
– 'David and Goliath' arms race. Annales Zoologici Fenni-
ci, 29: 207–216.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amori Giovanni, Luiselli Luca (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights except for commercial rights (transfer of commercial rights) and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
