Analysis of NMR Signal for Static Magnetic Field Standard

Authors

  • Peter Andris Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Sk-841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-1547
  • Tomáš Dermek Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Sk-841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Daniel Gogola Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Sk-841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Jiří Přibil Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Sk-841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Ivan Frollo Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Sk-841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2022-0010

Keywords:

nuclear magnetic resonance, NMR, static magnetic field standard, NMR signal

Abstract

This article describes the analysis of the NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) stabilizer signal. Magnetic field of the standard is created using an electromagnet. Sufficiently high stability of the magnetic field is achieved with the help of a stabilizer with an NMR probe. The NMR phenomenon makes possible very accurate measurements of the static magnetic field, but the resulting stability depends also on supporting electronics. An analysis has been done and tolerances of the measured quantities have been estimated. The calculated tolerances indicate the needed features of the material. First the probe excites the FID (Free Induction Decay) signal in the water sample and acquires the signal answer. It is Fourier transformed and its spectrum is investigated. The actual magnetic field corresponds to the strongest frequency sample. It is utilized for the magnetic field strength correction and stabilization of it. The article brings many equations for such calculation.

Downloads

Published

12.03.2022

How to Cite

Andris, P., Dermek, T., Gogola, D., Přibil, J., & Frollo, I. (2022). Analysis of NMR Signal for Static Magnetic Field Standard. Measurement Science Review, 22(2), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2022-0010