Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation in Additive Manufacturing with Complex Measurement Artifacts

Authors

  • Richard Joch Department of Machining and Production Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9937-0057
  • Miroslav Cedzo Department of Machining and Production Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-0925
  • Alžbeta Briliaková Department of Machining and Production Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6885-1422
  • Jozef Mrázik Department of Machining and Production Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia
  • Mário Drbúl Department of Machining and Production Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8036-1927
  • Jaromír Markovič Department of Machining and Production Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5645-6715

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2026-0005

Keywords:

additive manufacturing, measurement artifact, 3D scanning, coordinate measuring machine, CMM

Abstract

Accuracy and repeatability are among the key parameters in assessing the quality of additive manufacturing (AM) outputs, as they determine the usability of parts in technical and industrial practice. This study compares a standardized artifact defined by ISO/ASTM 52902 with a newly designed custom artifact, with measurements performed using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and 3D scanning. The dimensional deviations obtained for individual axes were statistically evaluated to determine whether the differences between artifacts and measurement methods were statistically significant. Additional analysis based on deviation mapping against the CAD model provided a more detailed view of process behavior for both simple and complex geometries. The results confirmed that the designed artifact can be considered a viable alternative to standardized solutions and offers advantages in practical applications, particularly in the context of quality control and optimization of measurement procedures.

Downloads

Published

23.01.2026

How to Cite

Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation in Additive Manufacturing with Complex Measurement Artifacts. (2026). Measurement Science Review, 26(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2026-0005

Similar Articles

71-80 of 120

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.