ISO Linear Calibration and Measurement Uncertainty of the Result ObtainedWith the Calibrated Instrument
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2022-0037Keywords:
Linear comparative calibration, ISO Technical Specification 28037:2010, Monte Carlo method, measurement uncertainty, calibrated instrument, empirical coverage probabilityAbstract
We address the problem of linear comparative calibration, a special case of linear calibration where both variables are measured with errors, and the analysis of the uncertainty of the measurement results obtained with the calibrated instrument. The concept is explained in detail using the calibration experiment of the pressure transducer and the subsequent analysis of the measurement uncertainties. In this context, the calibration and the measurements with the calibrated instrument are performed according to ISO Technical Specification 28037:2010 (here referred to as ISO linear calibration), based on the approximate linear calibration model and the application of the law of propagation of uncertainty (LPU) in this approximate model. Alternatively, estimates of the calibration line parameters, their standard uncertainties, the coverage intervals and the associated probability distributions are obtained using the Monte Carlo method (MCM) based on the law of propagation of distributions (LPD). Here we also obtain the probability distributions and the coverage interval for the quantities measured with the calibrated instrument. Furthermore, motivated by the model structure of this particular example, we conducted a simulation study that presents the empirical coverage probabilities of the ISO and MCM coverage intervals and investigates the influence of the sample size, i.e. the number of calibration points in the measurement range, and the different combinations of measurement uncertainties. The study generally confirms the good properties and validity of the ISO technical specification within the considered (limited) framework of experimental designs motivated by real-world application, with small uncertainties in relation to the measurement range. We also point out the potential weaknesses of this method that require increased user attention and emphasise the need for further research in this area.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Slovak Academy of Sciences - Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.